utils: fix python install for rule/ subdirectory
For reasons that are unclear to me, python's setuptools doesn't
install recursively from a directory, meaning that on make install,
the new Rules/Ruleset classes were not being installed. This patch
causes the rule subdirectory to be included.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 01:43:33PM -0600, Tyler Hicks wrote:
On 2015-01-13 11:33:10, Steve Beattie wrote:
utils: fix python install for rule/ subdirectory
For reasons that are unclear to me, python's setuptools doesn't
install recursively from a directory, meaning that on make install,
On 2015-01-13 11:33:10, Steve Beattie wrote:
utils: fix python install for rule/ subdirectory
For reasons that are unclear to me, python's setuptools doesn't
install recursively from a directory, meaning that on make install,
the new Rules/Ruleset classes were not being installed. This patch
Hello,
Am Dienstag, 13. Januar 2015 schrieb Steve Beattie:
Ah right, I wrote imprecisely in my patch header; we're actually using
python's included distutils and not setuptools, which is a separate
project, so don't have access to find_packages().
I'd meant to offer converting to setuptools
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:24:02AM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
Hello,
this patch splits is_covered() in capability.py into
- is_covered_localparts() for rule-specific code
- is_covered() for common code - located in __init__.py
I'm not keen on the naming convention x_localvars() that
