Re: [apparmor] [patch] more Make.rules cruft removal

2015-01-23 Thread Steve Beattie
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:53:43PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > > Index: b/Makefile > > === > > --- a/Makefile > > +++ b/Makefile > > @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@ > > # > > # > > -OVERRIDE_TARBALL=yes > > - > > -include common/Make.rules > > +

Re: [apparmor] [patch] fun with the toplevel Makefile

2015-01-23 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello, Am Freitag, 23. Januar 2015 schrieb Steve Beattie: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 06:23:29PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > So, a bit of history. When we originally organized things, it was > with the intention that individual subdirectories (parser, profiles, > utils, etc.) would get individu

Re: [apparmor] [patch] more Make.rules cruft removal

2015-01-23 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello, Am Freitag, 23. Januar 2015 schrieb Steve Beattie: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:30:44AM -0800, Steve Beattie wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 06:23:29PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > > Since we've gone with the single tarball approach to releases, a low > > priority task has been to rem

Re: [apparmor] [PATCH 20/31] parser: Remove prints and exits from features code

2015-01-23 Thread Tyler Hicks
On 2015-01-23 19:44:27, Christian Boltz wrote: > Hello, > > Am Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2015 schrieb Steve Beattie: > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:23:00PM -0600, Tyler Hicks wrote: > > > We don't know what a program linking to libapparmor will do with > > > stdout/stderr so I don't know if debug log

[apparmor] [patch] more Make.rules cruft removal

2015-01-23 Thread Steve Beattie
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:30:44AM -0800, Steve Beattie wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 06:23:29PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > Since we've gone with the single tarball approach to releases, a low > priority task has been to remove a bunch of the cruft in Make.rules > that's no longer relevant.

Re: [apparmor] [PATCH 20/31] parser: Remove prints and exits from features code

2015-01-23 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello, Am Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2015 schrieb Steve Beattie: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:23:00PM -0600, Tyler Hicks wrote: > > We don't know what a program linking to libapparmor will do with > > stdout/stderr so I don't know if debug logging to those streams is > > helpful. stderr doesn't sound

Re: [apparmor] [patch] fun with the toplevel Makefile

2015-01-23 Thread Steve Beattie
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 06:23:29PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > I just tried running make in the toplevel of a bzr trunk checkout, > which resulted in a quite funny result: [SNIP] > Note that we actually have several bugs here: > - "tarball" is the default make target, which is at least un

Re: [apparmor] Sprint about cross-distro profile maintenance?

2015-01-23 Thread John Johansen
On 01/22/2015 03:18 PM, Christian Boltz wrote: > Hello, > > Am Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2015 schrieb intrigeri: >> how about we have a 3 days sprint to work on cross-distro profile >> maintenance workflow and tools, e.g. in May or June? > > I like the idea, but I can't promise that I have 3 days on