On 02/09/2015 05:44 AM, Christian Boltz wrote:
Hello,
I have some feedback and questions before the meeting tomorrow ;-)
Am Freitag, 6. Februar 2015 schrieb John Johansen:
Anyways profiles in the unconfined mode show up as
profile (unconfined)
while the current behavior of the
Last week, I realized that I haven't been correctly using the terms context and
label. I've been interchanging them but they're two very distinct things as far
as AppArmor is concerned. I think the source of my confusion is from our own
documentation and code. These patches attempt to set the
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks tyhi...@canonical.com
---
tests/regression/apparmor/pivot_root.c | 30 +++---
tests/regression/apparmor/socketpair.c | 26 +-
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git
The correct usage of the terms context and label is not clear in the
aa_getcon(2) man page. The aa_getcon(2) family of functions are also
prototyped incorrectly since the *con parameter represents a label and
not a context.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks tyhi...@canonical.com
---
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks tyhi...@canonical.com
---
changehat/mod_apparmor/mod_apparmor.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/changehat/mod_apparmor/mod_apparmor.c
b/changehat/mod_apparmor/mod_apparmor.c
index 219ee6d..e3a8fea 100644
---
Adjust the libapparmor function prototypes, variable names, and comments
that incorrectly used the name con when referring to the label.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks tyhi...@canonical.com
---
libraries/libapparmor/include/sys/apparmor.h | 9 ++-
libraries/libapparmor/src/kernel_interface.c |
Hello,
I have some feedback and questions before the meeting tomorrow ;-)
Am Freitag, 6. Februar 2015 schrieb John Johansen:
Anyways profiles in the unconfined mode show up as
profile (unconfined)
while the current behavior of the unconfined profile, which is the
standard default profile
On 02/09/2015 02:37 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
Adjust the libapparmor function prototypes, variable names, and comments
that incorrectly used the name con when referring to the label.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks tyhi...@canonical.com
Acked-by: John Johansen john.johan...@canonical.com
---
There are two things that I missed, mentioned below. I've made these
changes locally.
On 2015-02-09 16:37:59, Tyler Hicks wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks tyhi...@canonical.com
---
tests/regression/apparmor/pivot_root.c | 30 +++---
On 02/09/2015 02:37 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks tyhi...@canonical.com
Acked-by: John Johansen john.johan...@canonical.com
---
changehat/mod_apparmor/mod_apparmor.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 02/09/2015 04:06 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
There are two things that I missed, mentioned below. I've made these
changes locally.
Arguable whether the profile change was needed, but I'm not arguing against
making the change.
It looks good, thanks
Acked-by: John Johansen
On 02/09/2015 02:37 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
The correct usage of the terms context and label is not clear in the
aa_getcon(2) man page. The aa_getcon(2) family of functions are also
prototyped incorrectly since the *con parameter represents a label and
not a context.
Signed-off-by: Tyler
On 2015-02-09 16:37:55, Tyler Hicks wrote:
Last week, I realized that I haven't been correctly using the terms context
and
label. I've been interchanging them but they're two very distinct things as
far
as AppArmor is concerned. I think the source of my confusion is from our own
13 matches
Mail list logo
