[apparmor] [patch] delete traces of program-chunks from apparmor.d(5)

2015-02-26 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello, this patch removes the last traces of the program-chunks directory, which I just found in the apparmor.d manpage. I propose this patch for trunk and 2.9 [ apparmor.d.pod--program-chunks.diff ] === modified file 'parser/apparmor.d.pod' --- parser/apparmor.d.pod 2014-12-19 01:14:2

Re: [apparmor] New LibreOffice Profile

2015-02-26 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello, Am Donnerstag, 5. Februar 2015 schrieb Bryan Quigley: > I've taken a few stabs (and followed a few others) at creating a > useful LibreOffice profile (attached, previous iterations[1]). > > This profile should not be turned on by default because: That means it should probably live in the

Re: [apparmor] [patch] delete traces of program-chunks from apparmor.d(5)

2015-02-26 Thread Tyler Hicks
On 2015-02-26 17:48:47, Christian Boltz wrote: > Hello, > > this patch removes the last traces of the program-chunks directory, > which I just found in the apparmor.d manpage. > > I propose this patch for trunk and 2.9 Acked-by: Tyler Hicks Tyler > > > > [ apparmor.d.pod--program-chunks.d

Re: [apparmor] [patch] fix build with GCC 5

2015-02-26 Thread Tyler Hicks
On 2015-02-24 14:46:55, Christian Boltz wrote: > Hello, > > I received the following patch to fix the build with GCC 5. > (The patch is for 2.9.1 and should be applied to trunk and 2.9.) > > Note: It seems the dbus.cc change was already done in trunk in exactly > the same way as in the patch, bu

Re: [apparmor] [patch] delete traces of program-chunks from apparmor.d(5)

2015-02-26 Thread Seth Arnold
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 05:48:47PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > Hello, > > this patch removes the last traces of the program-chunks directory, > which I just found in the apparmor.d manpage. > > I propose this patch for trunk and 2.9 Oh my yes. I can't ack this quickly enough. :) Acked-by:

Re: [apparmor] [patch] more gcc 5 errors

2015-02-26 Thread Steve Beattie
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 03:31:13PM -0800, John Johansen wrote: > yeah, basically, I don't think our use of dump returning ostream& > is a good use. the << operator is infix and transforms the code > which you don't get with the direct fn/method call. So it becomes > hard to correctly mix dump() wi

Re: [apparmor] [patch] fix minitools to work with multiple profiles at once

2015-02-26 Thread Steve Beattie
Hi, On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:52:43PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > this patch fixes the minitools (aa-audit, aa-complain, aa-enforce, > aa-autodep) to work with multiple profiles at once. > > The "trick" to fix the minitools is to call read_profiles() outside of > the for loop. > > Referen