On 11/18/2015 04:51 AM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 18. November 2015 schrieb Steve Beattie:
>> After the discussion in the IRC meeting yesterday and in preparation
>> for upcoming AppArmor 2.10.1 and 2.11 releases, I have created the
>> apparmor 2.10 branch on launchpad:
>
Thanks for the patch.
Acked-by: Kshitij Gupta for trunk and 2.10
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> PYMODULES is used for generating *.pod, so it should include rule/*.py
>
>
> [ utils-Makefile-pymodules.diff ]
>
>
Hello,
Am Dienstag, 17. November 2015 schrieb John Johansen:
> I'm fine with pulling this set back into the tools
>
> Acked-by: John Johansen
Thanks, commited.
Well, there's one exception:
> >> ==> 10-tests-tempdir.msg <==
> >> Add tempdir and tempfile handling
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we replaced parse_audit_allow() with parse_modifiers() in r2833, but
> overlooked that parse_modifiers() returns allow/deny as boolean. This
> resulted in storing bare file rules in
Hello,
Am Donnerstag, 19. November 2015 schrieb Kshitij Gupta:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Christian Boltz wrote:
...
> > BTW: I noticed this while playing with a more strict
> > profile_storage() that uses more dict()s instead of a big hasher()
> > monster.
>
> *stricter*
On 10/21/2015 03:02 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the last utils/test/Makefile change switched to using the in-tree
> libapparmor by default (unless USE_SYSTEM=1 is given). However, I missed
> to add the swig/python parts of libapparmor to PYTHONPATH, so the
> system-wide
Hello,
Am Mittwoch, 18. November 2015 schrieb Steve Beattie:
> After the discussion in the IRC meeting yesterday and in preparation
> for upcoming AppArmor 2.10.1 and 2.11 releases, I have created the
> apparmor 2.10 branch on launchpad:
I hereby nominate all my pending patches for 2.10 ;-)
On 10/21/2015 01:53 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2015 schrieb John Johansen:
>> On 07/20/2015 12:22 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
>>> for debugging, it's helpful to know which part of the code
>>> initialized a profile_storage and for which profile and hat this
On 10/22/2015 04:38 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as a preparation for the SignalRule class, add a match group
> to RE_PROFILE_SIGNAL.
>
> Also adjust test-regex_matches.py for the added group.
>
> Note: RE_PROFILE_SIGNAL is only used in aa.py, and only matches[0..2]
> are used. 0
After the discussion in the IRC meeting yesterday and in preparation for
upcoming AppArmor 2.10.1 and 2.11 releases, I have created the apparmor
2.10 branch on launchpad:
https://code.launchpad.net/~apparmor-dev/apparmor/2.10
People who like to receive emails when commits are made to that
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this patch changes aa.py to use SignalRule and SignalRuleset.
>
> This means:
> - import the classes instead of RE_PROFILE_SIGNAL
> - simplify signal rule parsing a lot
> - drop the (now unused) functions
For:
[ 13-test-signal-compare_obj.diff ]
[ 17-signal-rule-cleanup.diff ]
[ 21-test-signal-rename-tests.diff ]
Acked-by: Kshitij Gupta
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Freitag, 23. Oktober 2015 schrieb Christian
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> $subject ;-)
>
>
> [ 11-mergeprof-support-rlimit-and-signal.diff ]
>
> --- utils/aa-mergeprof 2015-06-25 21:32:37.420831338 +0200
> +++ utils/aa-mergeprof 2015-10-23 17:26:03.947428725 +0200
> @@ -631,7
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it's pointless to keep a separate file for those tests - they integrate
> well in test-signal.py.
>
> After the move, test-signal_parse.py is empty and will be deleted.
>
>
> [
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> besides 'signal', also 'change_profile' and 'rlimit' cleanup was missing
> for the main profile.
>
> In aa.py delete_duplicates() (used to check includes), only 'signal' was
> missing.
>
>
>
> [
Accidentally hit reply instead of reply all.
Lets see if this goes through.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Kshitij Gupta wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Christian Boltz
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> this patch changes aa.py to use
Hello,
Am Mittwoch, 18. November 2015 schrieb Jamie Strandboge:
> Description: update python abstraction for python 3.5
>
> Signed-off-by: Jamie Strandboge
I'd prefer a more future-proof version, which means to use
python{2.[4-7],3.[0-9]}
in all rules ;-)
With or
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the tests in test-signal_parse.py used aa.parse_signal_rule(), which is
> based on Raw_Signal_Rule (= regex check + "just store it").
>
> This patch changes the tests to test against SignalRule.get_clean().
Description: update python abstraction for python 3.5
Signed-off-by: Jamie Strandboge
--
Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
Author: Jamie Strandboge
Description: update python abstraction for python 3.5
Index:
19 matches
Mail list logo