good afternoon,
I want to ask if AppArmor provide any kind of interface to IMA or TPM,
in order to have some remote attestation or (at least) integroty
control.
If it's not available any interface, there is some features able to do
that?
Thank u for your time.
--
AppArmor mailing list
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 05:35:29PM +0100, Simone Pierluigi Sortino S210003
wrote:
> I want to ask if AppArmor provide any kind of interface to IMA or
> TPM, in order to have some remote attestation or (at least)
> integroty control.
>
> If it's not available any interface, there is some features
Hello,
@{pids} and @{apparmorfs} was not mentioned in the apparmor.d manpage.
I propose this patch for trunk, 2.10 and 2.9 (all have those variables
defined in tunables/*)
[ apparmor.d.pod-add-missing-variables.diff ]
=== modified file ./parser/apparmor.d.pod
--- parser/apparmor.d.pod
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 03:49:17PM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> This adds a basic support for parallel compiles. It uses a fork()/wait
> @@ -286,8 +324,13 @@ static int process_arg(int c, char *optarg)
> option = OPTION_ADD;
> break;
> case 'd':
> -
On 11/20/2015 04:01 PM, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 03:49:17PM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
>> This adds a basic support for parallel compiles. It uses a fork()/wait
>> @@ -286,8 +324,13 @@ static int process_arg(int c, char *optarg)
>> option = OPTION_ADD;
>>
