Re: [apparmor] Support for owner specification

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 09:10:35PM +0200, azu...@pobox.sk wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:46:49AM +0200, azu...@pobox.sk wrote: > >> owner=fred > can i, somehow, speed up the implementation? To financially sponsor it for > example? Not that i know of, all the engineers that are familiar

Re: [apparmor] Support for owner specification

Citát Seth Arnold : On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:46:49AM +0200, azu...@pobox.sk wrote: owner=fred owner=1001 owner=(fred) owner=(fred george) owner=(fred 1001) Is this still not supported? If not, when it will be? Is support missing only in userspace tools or

Re: [apparmor] Support for owner specification

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:46:49AM +0200, azu...@pobox.sk wrote: > owner=fred > owner=1001 > owner=(fred) > owner=(fred george) > owner=(fred 1001) > Is this still not supported? If not, when it will be? Is support missing > only in userspace tools or directly in kernel? Hello Azur, none of

[apparmor] Support for owner specification

Hi, this is written in AppArmor wiki ( http://wiki.apparmor.net/index.php/AppArmor_Core_Policy_Reference ): === extended ownership tests (not currently supported) If the optional equal operator is used then, the test is not against the euid/fsuid but that the object has the same uid as