On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Seth Arnold
> wrote:
>> Hello Matthew, thanks for this; I'll let John comment on the larger design
>> of the patch, I'll just nitpick one little piece:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 04:08:15PM -0800, Matthe
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Seth Arnold wrote:
> Hello Matthew, thanks for this; I'll let John comment on the larger design
> of the patch, I'll just nitpick one little piece:
>
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 04:08:15PM -0800, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> + kzfree(profile->xattrs);
>> + kzfre
On 12/08/2017 08:20 AM, Viacheslav Salnikov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> First of all, I googled and experimented. Didn't work out so well.
>
> I want to ensure that communication through unix socket is monitored by
> apparmor.
> What should I do to make this happen?
>
As Seth mentioned you will need a
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 06:20:01PM +0200, Viacheslav Salnikov wrote:
> I want to ensure that communication through unix socket is monitored by
> apparmor.
> What should I do to make this happen?
Hello Viacheslav,
This is actually slightly complicated to answer:
- Different kernels will have diff
Hello,
First of all, I googled and experimented. Didn't work out so well.
I want to ensure that communication through unix socket is monitored by
apparmor.
What should I do to make this happen?
Hope you will help me with that.
Thanks.
--
AppArmor mailing list
AppArmor@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify s
