Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Montag, 26. März 2018, 14:56:23 CEST schrieb appar...@raf.org:
> > actually, apparmor doesn't like the "[.-]" construct.
>
> What exactly do you mean with "doesn't like"? Does it break something?
> If so, some details and the exact error message would be h
Hello,
Am Montag, 26. März 2018, 14:56:23 CEST schrieb appar...@raf.org:
> actually, apparmor doesn't like the "[.-]" construct.
What exactly do you mean with "doesn't like"? Does it break something?
If so, some details and the exact error message would be helpful ;-)
Regards,
Christian Boltz
intrigeri wrote:
> appar...@raf.org:
> >> This does not match name="/run/lock/apache2/mpm-accept-0.22001"
> >>
> >> What about the broader:
> >>
> >>/{var/,}run/lock/apache2/mpm-accept* wk,
> >>
> >> ?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> --
> >> intrigeri
>
> > hi,
>
> > ah, i see it now. there's a
appar...@raf.org:
>> This does not match name="/run/lock/apache2/mpm-accept-0.22001"
>>
>> What about the broader:
>>
>>/{var/,}run/lock/apache2/mpm-accept* wk,
>>
>> ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> intrigeri
> hi,
> ah, i see it now. there's a "-" before the 0 where the rule
> is expecting a "
intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> appar...@raf.org:
> > however, there is this rule in /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.apache2:
>
> > /{var/,}run/lock/apache2/mpm-accept.[0-9]* wk,
>
> > any idea why this rule is not being recognised?
>
> This does not match name="/run/lock/apache2/mpm-accept-0.22001"
>
Hi,
appar...@raf.org:
> however, there is this rule in /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.apache2:
> /{var/,}run/lock/apache2/mpm-accept.[0-9]* wk,
> any idea why this rule is not being recognised?
This does not match name="/run/lock/apache2/mpm-accept-0.22001"
What about the broader:
/{var/,}run/
