On 10/01/2019 01:31, John Johansen wrote:
> Well this is certainly allowed, and the python based tools should be able
> to support it. Are you sure they weren't failing in the past? If so this
> would be a regression.
I have around 300 profiles, some of them are disabled because they're not
finishe
On 1/9/19 3:59 PM, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:48:44PM +0100, Mikhail Morfikov wrote:
>> @{exec_path} = /usr/bin/keepassxc
>> profile keepassxc @{exec_path} {
>> }
>
>> # aa-complain usr.bin.keepassxc
>> ERROR: Profile for @{exec_path} exists in /etc/apparmor.d/some-app and
>>
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:48:44PM +0100, Mikhail Morfikov wrote:
> @{exec_path} = /usr/bin/keepassxc
> profile keepassxc @{exec_path} {
> }
> # aa-complain usr.bin.keepassxc
> ERROR: Profile for @{exec_path} exists in /etc/apparmor.d/some-app and
> /etc/apparmor.d/some-other-app
> Should this h
For some time I've been using the following snipped to
create new profiles:
include
@{exec_path} = /usr/bin/keepassxc
profile keepassxc @{exec_path} {
#include
@{exec_path} mr,
}
The path of course changes as well as the profile name.
Th
