Re: [apparmor] Accessing DMI data!?

On Monday, February 10, 2020 3:23 PM, mailinglis...@posteo.de wrote: > hello, > > i just discovered, some apps desire access to DMI data, precisely to > /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/ > > In the case of audio software i can understand it may need to know on > what hardware it runs. > > but a web

Re: [apparmor] [PATCH 1/1] apparmor: Fix warning about unused function apparmor_ipv6_postroute

truct sk_buff *skb, > const struct nf_hook_state *state) > { > return apparmor_ip_postroute(priv, skb, state); > } > +#endif > > static const struct nf_hook_ops apparmor_nf_ops[] = { > { > > > > 2.19.1 Tested-by: Jordan Glover -- AppArmor mailing list AppArmor@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor

Re: [apparmor] warning: ‘apparmor_ipv6_postroute’ defined but not used

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Sunday, November 11, 2018 9:01 PM, Jordan Glover wrote: > > I can reproduce this even on vanilla 4.20-rc1. > > security/apparmor/lsm.c:1601:21: warning: ‘apparmor_ipv6_postroute’ defined > but not used [-Wunused-function] > s

Re: [apparmor] warning: ‘apparmor_ipv6_postroute’ defined but not used

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, November 10, 2018 4:14 PM, Jordan Glover wrote: > Hello, > > During compilation Linux 4.20-rc1 with GCC 8.2.1 and below compat patches > added: > > apparmor: userspace queries > [PATCH 1/3] apparmor: patch to provide compat

[apparmor] warning: ‘apparmor_ipv6_postroute’ defined but not used

Hello, During compilation Linux 4.20-rc1 with GCC 8.2.1 and below compat patches added: apparmor: userspace queries [PATCH 1/3] apparmor: patch to provide compatibility with v2.x net rules [PATCH 2/3] apparmor: af_unix mediation [PATCH 3/3] apparmor: fix use after free in sk_peer_label there is

Re: [apparmor] Proposal for a new AppArmor logo

On May 25, 2018 11:15 AM, John Johansen <john.johan...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 05/24/2018 02:35 AM, Jordan Glover wrote: > > > On May 24, 2018 7:01 AM, Noah Davis noaha...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > I've attached a version with red instead of cyan. > >

Re: [apparmor] Proposal for a new AppArmor logo

others think. Jordan > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 5:35 AM, Jordan Glover > > golden_mille...@protonmail.ch wrote: > > > On May 24, 2018 7:01 AM, Noah Davis noaha...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > I've attached a version with red instead of cyan. > > > >

Re: [apparmor] Proposal for a new AppArmor logo

On May 24, 2018 7:01 AM, Noah Davis wrote: > I've attached a version with red instead of cyan. > Thanks. I also wonder how it looks when colors are distributed like below: A/ /A instead of: A| |A Maybe this can be put on vote on AppArmor summit? Jordan --

Re: [apparmor] Proposal for a new AppArmor logo

On May 23, 2018 3:27 AM, Noah Davis wrote: > Whoops, I accidentally sent an older 32x32 version. I've attached the > > 64x64 version with some slight adjustments to the size of the 'A's, > > inner shield and height of the shadow on the leg of the white 'A'. > > This kind

[apparmor] [PATCH] apparmor: update git and wiki locations in AppArmor docs

-off-by: Jordan Glover <golden_mille...@protonmail.ch> --- Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/apparmor.rst | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/apparmor.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/apparmor.rst index 3e9734bd..6cf81bbd