This wasn't really rejected, just superceded by intregeri's merge proposal
above, which was accepted and merged.
Thanks for working on this!
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~cameronnemo/apparmor/gnome-abstraction/+merge/261320
Your team AppArmor Developers is requested to review the proposed merge
The proposal to merge lp:~cameronnemo/apparmor/gnome-abstraction into
lp:apparmor has been updated.
Status: Needs review => Rejected
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~cameronnemo/apparmor/gnome-abstraction/+merge/261320
--
Your team AppArmor Developers is requested to revie
Review: Disapprove
> We've been blocking this merge since 1.5 years on a trivial "2 lines that
> could be merged" issue. One of the proposed changes has been applied
> independently already, and the other one is very much needed. I'll try to
> propose a branch that does only the latter change so w
We've been blocking this merge since 1.5 years on a trivial "2 lines that could
be merged" issue. One of the proposed changes has been applied independently
already, and the other one is very much needed. I'll try to propose a branch
that does only the latter change so we can eventually close th
> I'd like to see your added line
> + owner @{HOME}/.config/gtk-3.0/** r,
> merged with the existing
>owner @{HOME}/.config/gtk-2.0/** r,
> which would result in
>owner @{HOME}/.config/gtk-[23].0/** r,
ACK
> If you expect the .0 to change, maybe also [23].[0-9].
I serious
It seems your merge request somehow got lost, sorry for that!
I'd like to see your added line
+ owner @{HOME}/.config/gtk-3.0/** r,
merged with the existing
owner @{HOME}/.config/gtk-2.0/** r,
which would result in
owner @{HOME}/.config/gtk-[23].0/** r,
If you expect the .0
Cameron Norman has proposed merging lp:~cameronnemo/apparmor/gnome-abstraction
into lp:apparmor.
Requested reviews:
AppArmor Developers (apparmor-dev)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~cameronnemo/apparmor/gnome-abstraction/+merge/261320
--
Your team AppArmor Developers is re
