On 2013-12-23 13:10:01, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:40:13PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:06:26PM -0800, Steve Beattie wrote:
> > > Ah, that's a very good point. I don't object to this approach for
> > > the parser. Another solution would be to move
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:40:13PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:06:26PM -0800, Steve Beattie wrote:
> > Ah, that's a very good point. I don't object to this approach for
> > the parser. Another solution would be to move the public facing
> > headers outside of the src/ tre
On 12/20/2013 11:06 PM, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:36:10PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
>> Is building against the in-tree version the "best" default?
>
> Yes. If there's been any development of the parser that depends on
> features of libapparmor that are newer than your syste
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:06:26PM -0800, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:36:10PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> > Is building against the in-tree version the "best" default?
>
> Yes. If there's been any development of the parser that depends on
> features of libapparmor that are ne
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:36:10PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> Is building against the in-tree version the "best" default?
Yes. If there's been any development of the parser that depends on
features of libapparmor that are newer than your system's libapparmor,
then your compilation will fail. As a
On 12/06/2013 08:57 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> By default, statically link against the in-tree libapparmor. If the
> in-tree libapparmor is not yet built, print a helpful error message. To
> build against the system libapparmor, the SYSTEM_LIBAPPARMOR make
> variable can be set on the command line li
On 2013-12-10 13:36:10, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 08:57:57PM -0800, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> > By default, statically link against the in-tree libapparmor. If the
> > in-tree libapparmor is not yet built, print a helpful error message. To
> > build against the system libapparmor, the
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 08:57:57PM -0800, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> By default, statically link against the in-tree libapparmor. If the
> in-tree libapparmor is not yet built, print a helpful error message. To
> build against the system libapparmor, the SYSTEM_LIBAPPARMOR make
> variable can be set on t
By default, statically link against the in-tree libapparmor. If the
in-tree libapparmor is not yet built, print a helpful error message. To
build against the system libapparmor, the SYSTEM_LIBAPPARMOR make
variable can be set on the command line like so:
$ make SYSTEM_LIBAPPARMOR=1
This patch a
