On 07/25/2013 11:59 AM, John Johansen wrote:
> On 07/25/2013 11:37 AM, Christian Boltz wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Am Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013 schrieb John Johansen:
>>> -- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/parser/tst/simple_tests/capability/ok_allow2.sd
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
>>> +#
>>> +#=DESCRIPTION validate some use
On 07/25/2013 11:37 AM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013 schrieb John Johansen:
>> -- /dev/null
>> +++ b/parser/tst/simple_tests/capability/ok_allow2.sd
>> @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
>> +#
>> +#=DESCRIPTION validate some uses of capabilties.
>> +#=EXRESULT PASS
>> +# vim:syntax
Hello,
Am Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013 schrieb John Johansen:
> -- /dev/null
> +++ b/parser/tst/simple_tests/capability/ok_allow2.sd
> @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
> +#
> +#=DESCRIPTION validate some uses of capabilties.
> +#=EXRESULT PASS
> +# vim:syntax=subdomain
What about syntax=apparmor ? ;-)
> +# Last Modi
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:32:46PM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> let allow be used as a prefix in place of deny. Allow is the default
> and is implicit so it is not needed but some user keep tripping over
> it, and it makes the language more symmetric
>
>eg.
> /foo rw,
> allow /fo