Re: [apparmor] [patch] Ignore test failures about duplicated conditionals in dbus rules

2017-05-08 Thread Tyler Hicks
On 04/20/2017 02:23 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote: > On 04/15/2017 05:54 PM, Christian Boltz wrote: >> Am Samstag, 25. März 2017, 21:53:21 CEST schrieb Christian Boltz: >>> since r3634, the tools allow any order of dbus conditionals. >>> >>> Quoting the r3634 patch description: >>> >>> This patch eases t

Re: [apparmor] [patch] Ignore test failures about duplicated conditionals in dbus rules

2017-04-20 Thread Tyler Hicks
On 04/15/2017 05:54 PM, Christian Boltz wrote: > Hello, > > Any comments or reviews on this patch? > > If nobody objects, I'll commit it (to trunk and 2.11) on Wednesday as > Acked-by . I see that the review period timed out already. That's fine by me as the change looks correct. Sorry that nob

Re: [apparmor] [patch] Ignore test failures about duplicated conditionals in dbus rules

2017-04-15 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello, Any comments or reviews on this patch? If nobody objects, I'll commit it (to trunk and 2.11) on Wednesday as Acked-by . Am Samstag, 25. März 2017, 21:53:21 CEST schrieb Christian Boltz: > since r3634, the tools allow any order of dbus conditionals. > > Quoting the r3634 patch descriptio

[apparmor] [patch] Ignore test failures about duplicated conditionals in dbus rules

2017-03-25 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello, since r3634, the tools allow any order of dbus conditionals. Quoting the r3634 patch description: This patch eases the restriction on the ordering at the expense of the utils no longer being able to detect and reject a single attribute that is repeated multiple times. In that situat