On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:13:53PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
> parser/Makefile also has a dist_clean:
Sigh, so much cruft.
> Note that "dist_clean" deletes files that are already deleted by
> "clean", which means "dist_clean" is basically superfluous ;-)
>
> Assuming that nobody uses dist_c
Hello,
Am Dienstag, 27. Januar 2015 schrieb Steve Beattie:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 03:22:59PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
> > > O, it needs to die with fire, it does. Patch follows, that
> > > also
> > > converts the libapparmor/doc/ clean to get rid of the manpages on
> > > make clean, no
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 03:22:59PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
> > O, it needs to die with fire, it does. Patch follows, that also
> > converts the libapparmor/doc/ clean to get rid of the manpages on make
> > clean, not make maintainer-clean.
>
> How many shades of clean do our Makefiles co
Hello,
Am Freitag, 23. Januar 2015 schrieb Steve Beattie:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:53:43PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
> > parser/Makefile is the only remaining user of DISTRO, so maybe we
> > should move it there in a follow-up patch.
>
> I kind of want it to go away; it's only use is to d
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:53:43PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
> > Index: b/Makefile
> > ===
> > --- a/Makefile
> > +++ b/Makefile
> > @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
> > #
> > #
> > -OVERRIDE_TARBALL=yes
> > -
> > -include common/Make.rules
> > +
Hello,
Am Freitag, 23. Januar 2015 schrieb Steve Beattie:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:30:44AM -0800, Steve Beattie wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 06:23:29PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
> > Since we've gone with the single tarball approach to releases, a low
> > priority task has been to rem
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:30:44AM -0800, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 06:23:29PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Since we've gone with the single tarball approach to releases, a low
> priority task has been to remove a bunch of the cruft in Make.rules
> that's no longer relevant.
