[apparmor] [patch] rule class - split out common parts from is_covered()

Hello, this patch splits is_covered() in capability.py into - is_covered_localparts() for rule-specific code - is_covered() for common code - located in __init__.py The object type comparison now uses type(self) and a slightly different error message to make it usable everywhere. It also renames

Re: [apparmor] [patch] rule class - split out common parts from is_covered()

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:24:02AM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > Hello, > > this patch splits is_covered() in capability.py into > - is_covered_localparts() for rule-specific code > - is_covered() for common code - located in __init__.py I'm not keen on the naming convention x_localvars() t

Re: [apparmor] [patch] rule class - split out common parts from is_covered()

Hello, Am Dienstag, 13. Januar 2015 schrieb Steve Beattie: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:24:02AM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > > this patch splits is_covered() in capability.py into > > - is_covered_localparts() for rule-specific code > > - is_covered() for common code - located in __init__.py >

Re: [apparmor] [patch] rule class - split out common parts from is_covered()

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 01:58:58PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > Am Dienstag, 13. Januar 2015 schrieb Steve Beattie: > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:24:02AM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > > > this patch splits is_covered() in capability.py into > > > - is_covered_localparts() for rule-specific co