On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 01:49:54PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
> I found another evil testcase:
> parser/tst/simple_tests/vars/vars_alternation_3.sd
> (and I'm slightly ;-) surprised about EXRESULT PASS - I wouldn't be
> surprised if it breaks the tools)
As an aside, one of my future goals is
Hello,
Am Donnerstag, 6. März 2014 schrieb Steve Beattie:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:10:16PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 5. März 2014 schrieb Steve Beattie:
> > > D-Bus rules in particular seem to get written as multi-line rules.
> > > This patch adds very simple hackish suppo
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:02:24PM -0800, Steve Beattie wrote:
> Subject: utils: add simple parsing of multi-line rules [v2]
>
> D-Bus rules in particular seem to get written as multi-line rules. This
> patch adds very simple hackish support for multiple lines. Essentially,
> what it does is if th
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:10:16PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 5. März 2014 schrieb Steve Beattie:
> > D-Bus rules in particular seem to get written as multi-line rules.
> > This patch adds very simple hackish support for multiple lines.
> > Essentially, what it does is if the pars
Hello,
Am Mittwoch, 5. März 2014 schrieb Steve Beattie:
> D-Bus rules in particular seem to get written as multi-line rules.
> This patch adds very simple hackish support for multiple lines.
> Essentially, what it does is if the parsing of a line doesn't match
> anything and falls all the way thro
D-Bus rules in particular seem to get written as multi-line rules. This
patch adds very simple hackish support for multiple lines. Essentially,
what it does is if the parsing of a line doesn't match anything and
falls all the way through, it saves the line and prepends it to the next
line that occu
