On 03/24/2014 05:59 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On 03/21/2014 08:34 PM, Seth Arnold wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 04:29:30PM -0700, john.johan...@canonical.com wrote:
>>> ptrace rules currently take the form of
>>>
>>> ptrace [] [],
>>> ptrace_perm := read|trace|readby|tracedby
>>> ptra
On 03/21/2014 08:34 PM, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 04:29:30PM -0700, john.johan...@canonical.com wrote:
>> ptrace rules currently take the form of
>>
>> ptrace [] [],
>> ptrace_perm := read|trace|readby|tracedby
>> ptrace_perms := ptrace_perm | '(' ptrace_perm+ ')'
>>
>> Aft
On 03/17/2014 06:29 PM, john.johan...@canonical.com wrote:
> ptrace rules currently take the form of
>
> ptrace [] [],
> ptrace_perm := read|trace|readby|tracedby
> ptrace_perms := ptrace_perm | '(' ptrace_perm+ ')'
I just mentioned that signal should use this:
signal (send,receive) set=
On 03/21/2014 06:34 PM, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 04:29:30PM -0700, john.johan...@canonical.com wrote:
>> ptrace rules currently take the form of
>>
>> ptrace [] [],
>> ptrace_perm := read|trace|readby|tracedby
>> ptrace_perms := ptrace_perm | '(' ptrace_perm+ ')'
>>
>> Aft
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 04:29:30PM -0700, john.johan...@canonical.com wrote:
> ptrace rules currently take the form of
>
> ptrace [] [],
> ptrace_perm := read|trace|readby|tracedby
> ptrace_perms := ptrace_perm | '(' ptrace_perm+ ')'
>
> After having used the cross check (permission needed
ptrace rules currently take the form of
ptrace [] [],
ptrace_perm := read|trace|readby|tracedby
ptrace_perms := ptrace_perm | '(' ptrace_perm+ ')'
After having used the cross check (permission needed in both profiles)
I am not sure it is correct for ptrace.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen
-
