On 01/02/2013 02:52 PM, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 02:39:55PM -0800, John Johansen wrote:
>> On 12/18/2012 06:17 AM, Steve Beattie wrote:
>>> The apparmor_api abstractions make the mistake of including tunables
>>> directly, which is a no-no since the variable definitions in tun
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 02:39:55PM -0800, John Johansen wrote:
> On 12/18/2012 06:17 AM, Steve Beattie wrote:
> > The apparmor_api abstractions make the mistake of including tunables
> > directly, which is a no-no since the variable definitions in tunables
> > need to occur in the preamble of a pro
On 12/18/2012 06:17 AM, Steve Beattie wrote:
> The apparmor_api abstractions make the mistake of including tunables
> directly, which is a no-no since the variable definitions in tunables
> need to occur in the preamble of a profile, not embedded within it.
> This patch removes those includes, and
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 06:17:59AM -0800, Steve Beattie wrote:
> The apparmor_api abstractions make the mistake of including tunables
> directly, which is a no-no since the variable definitions in tunables
> need to occur in the preamble of a profile, not embedded within it.
> This patch removes th
The apparmor_api abstractions make the mistake of including tunables
directly, which is a no-no since the variable definitions in tunables
need to occur in the preamble of a profile, not embedded within it.
This patch removes those includes, and replaces them documentation of
tunables are necessary
