So we have a binary (C based) version of aa-exec that just needs a little
more revision before we land it. One of the things we need to decide is
which package to put it in.
We could modify the utils packaging to handle binary and no arch, create
a new package for binary utils, or just move it int
On 07/24/2013 11:26 AM, John Johansen wrote:
> So we have a binary (C based) version of aa-exec that just needs a little
> more revision before we land it. One of the things we need to decide is
> which package to put it in.
>
> We could modify the utils packaging to handle binary and no arch, cre
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:26:43AM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> So we have a binary (C based) version of aa-exec that just needs a little
> more revision before we land it. One of the things we need to decide is
> which package to put it in.
>
> We could modify the utils packaging to handle binar
On 07/24/2013 11:02 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On 07/24/2013 11:26 AM, John Johansen wrote:
>> So we have a binary (C based) version of aa-exec that just needs a little
>> more revision before we land it. One of the things we need to decide is
>> which package to put it in.
>>
>> We could modify
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:26:43AM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> So we have a binary (C based) version of aa-exec that just needs a little
> more revision before we land it. One of the things we need to decide is
> which package to put it in.
>
> We could modify the utils packaging to handle binar
On 07/24/2013 02:35 PM, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:26:43AM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
>> So we have a binary (C based) version of aa-exec that just needs a little
>> more revision before we land it. One of the things we need to decide is
>> which package to put it in.
>>
>>
On 07/24/2013 05:29 PM, John Johansen wrote:
> On 07/24/2013 02:35 PM, Steve Beattie wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:26:43AM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
>> directory becoming more of an architecture dependent collection of
>> binaries. But it's not a strongly held position.
>>
> I actually do
On 07/25/2013 03:57 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On 07/24/2013 05:29 PM, John Johansen wrote:
>> On 07/24/2013 02:35 PM, Steve Beattie wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:26:43AM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
>
>>> directory becoming more of an architecture dependent collection of
>>> binaries. B