--
Sent using BlackBerry
- Original Message -
From: apple-crop@virtualorchard.net apple-crop@virtualorchard.net
To: apple-crop@virtualorchard.net apple-crop@virtualorchard.net
Sent: Mon Jan 25 21:14:37 2010
Subject: Re: Apple-Crop: Pesticide Rates and Tree Row Volume
Hello All,
I
Hello All,
I have found the discussion that has arisen from my initial questions
fascinating and the answers nowhere near as clear-cut as I had imagined.
My original post included a plea to the pesticide manufacturers, EPA and
what is left of our unfortunately underfunded extension experts
-Original Message-
From: apple-crop@virtualorchard.net [mailto:apple-c...@virtualorchard.net]
On Behalf Of Dave Rosenberger
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:54 PM
To: apple-crop@virtualorchard.net
Subject: Re: Apple-Crop: Pesticide Rates and Tree Row Volume
Hi, Rick --
Your method
...@virtualorchard.net]
On Behalf Of Dave Rosenberger
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:22 AM
To: apple-crop@virtualorchard.net
Subject: RE: Apple-Crop: Pesticide Rates and Tree Row Volume
Hi, Harold --
No, you should not deduct the drive-space of the untraveled
row when spraying
@virtualorchard.net [mailto:apple-c...@virtualorchard.net]
On Behalf Of Dave Rosenberger
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:22 AM
To: apple-crop@virtualorchard.net
Subject: RE: Apple-Crop: Pesticide Rates and Tree Row Volume
Hi, Harold --
No, you should not deduct the drive-space of the untraveled
row
Rick: I've been waiting for you to add to the discussion, after our experience
with codling moth sprays, etc.
Sorry, but no F AND G Notes today. Hope to see you at the Fruit Schools..
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Richard Weinzierl weinz...@uiuc.edu
To: Apple-Crop
