On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 11:09 -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Did that, but I still need to fix the failing tests before you
> bother...
>
> Maybe Saturday.
No rush.
--
Bojan
Adam Prime wrote:
My understanding of =over , which seems to be confirmed by perldoc
perlpod was that is the indent level, so i'm not sure why you
would want to bump it.
You sir are correct. Apparently back in the day I misread and learned
that wrongly.
Fixed in trunk and v2_10.
--
--
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 01:40 -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Committed revision 721096.
Backported to branches/2_10 721099.
Let me know when you backport all the stuff you wanted to get from the
trunk and I'll roll RC2.
Did that, but I still need to fix the failing tests
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Adam Prime wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/apreq/docs/libapreq2/group__apreq__xs__request.html
Does the attached patch work?
Committed revision 721096.
Backported to branches/2_10 721099.
you forgot to bump the =over value :)
My understandin
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 01:40 -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Committed revision 721096.
> Backported to branches/2_10 721099.
Let me know when you backport all the stuff you wanted to get from the
trunk and I'll roll RC2.
--
Bojan
