m{el,hf}.
I got my sid armhf Raspi fixed today (it stopped booting a while ago,
seemed to have been a usrmerge related issue), so I can now test
patches locally on armhf again.
Will try to get an upload done based on Steinar's patch instructions
soon-ish. But I first need to get the Raspi uptodat
ndeed might
> > be a bug in this case.
>
> Do you need the bundle?
Actually that would be interesting, as I have a vague idea how it
might have been triggered and would like to experiment a bit if I can
find a simpler reproducer.
BTW, do I remember right that you have APT::Install-
ther of that seems to be case. So it indeed might
be a bug in this case.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59
Source: aptitude
Version: 0.8.13-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@debian.org, z...@debian.org
Citing from https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=aptitude:
BinNMU changelog for aptitude on amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el,
ppc64el, riscv64, s390x, alpha, hppa,
on stems from times where aptitude still also had a GUI
frontend.)
P.S.: Thanks to Thomas for fixing the recent ncurses issues (htop,
etc.) so quickly at upstream!
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Develop
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.13-5
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
On prompts like e.g. "Really quit Aptitude? [n]y", aptitude does not
accept uppercase letters like Y or N as answer.
Originally reported in Ubuntu at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/2020232
-- System Infor
f you have libsystemd0 installed.
(I also doubt that all of these are really necessary. Probably
"aptitude-dbgsym libapt-pkg6.0-dbgsym libboost-iostreams1.74.0-dbgsym
libcwidget4-dbgsym libgcc-s1-dbgsym libncursesw6-dbgsym
libsigc++-2.0-0v5-dbgsym libxapian30-dbgsym" already suffice to cover
every
to do if I would have been able to
reproduce it. :-)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6
g will reveal some more details.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 1024D:
related to my environment somehow (Testing
> on a desktop PC), but it doesn't tell.
Ack. Doesn't look like a repo issue. Except maybe, if there's a common
non-debian APT repo involved.
Oh, and since about when is this happening? I assume this showed up
only recently, not for
a new
> shortcut?
I don't think that's a good idea as it breaks current TUI workflows
and the muscle memory of users.
> Or a dialog could ask which type of upgrade the user wants to
> invoke?
Neither that, for the same reason.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. |
d ones
> used instead.
Ran into this today, too. I think we had this already when bullseye
switched from testing to stable or so and I think there's a bug report
for this, too, already. Will search later for that one.
Interestingly compared to your last bug repoirt this time I think the
sever
eport (at
least those parts which were clear enough) and agree with the apt
developers that the message about the Debian bookworm change
concerning non-free-firmware is only a notice, not a warning.
And I don't expect that Manuel (and surely not me myself) will change
something in the way ap
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.13-5
Severity: normal
aptitude just crashed with a segfault for me when updating the package
list while a mirror update was close to be finished on the used Debian
mirror. (Haven't seen a segfault in aptitude for quite a while, so I
assume this is either a rather sel
iting.
Thanks for the report!
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26
apt-listchanges)? — I have no
idea, why apt-listchanges should try to open a GTK application
otherwise.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' |
nal information, feel free to just send
the file or link to me and feel free to encrypt it with PGP for one of
my PGP keys shown below. (The 4096 bits key is also available in the
file /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg if the package
debian-keyring is installed.)
Regards, Axel
-
don't
> > see a bug here.
>
> Well, the "because of dependency errors" in the above message is
> incorrect and very confusing. Since there are no dependency errors,
> this cannot be because of dependency errors.
Indeed. Thanks for the additional information!
this:
Conflicts: lsb-base
So from my point of view aptitude did everything correctly and I don't
see a bug here.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 409
implemented or requested
this and me myself :-) want to see that output in any case.
I see quite a few cases where it makes sense to wait before the user
is acknowledging that the output has been seen (or is not relevant):
E.g. it is very useful if you have APT plugins like how-can-i-help
which ou
> bool quit_after_dpkg_run = false;
> -if(rval != pkgPackageManager::Incomplete)
> +if(rval != pkgPackageManager::Completed)
>{
> cout << _("Press Return to continue, 'q' followed by Return to
> quit.") << endl;
Doesn't ma
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.13-5
Severity: minor
Pressing "C" for getting the changelog on debian-policy when marked for
updating from 4.6.1.0 to 4.6.1.1, aptitude-changelog-parser throws a
warning (multiple times) and scrambles the whole screen with them:
Pa
you say.
Thanks for adding my to the cwidget team. I will do an cwidget upload
within the next few days and afterwards an aptitude upload.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Adm
Hi Manuel,
TL;DR: Please grant me cwidget team membership on Salsa so we don't
have to NMU it. Or just do an upload of cwidget with the patch from
#1015925.
I know you're busy with RISC-V and other stuff, but please do me a
small favour and add me to the cwidget team on Salsa, probably via
https:
Hi Paul,
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-07-26 at 00:28 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Paul Wise wrote:
> > > I tried to build aptitude, found it fails due to cwidget bug #1015925.
> >
> > Do you intend to NMU that?
>
> I'd prefer the cwidget team take
n't make sense to upload a new aptitude
package before #1015925 is fixed.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 409
the default C++ standard didn't change for GCC 12.
Thanks!
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517
Hi Matthias,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > To build with GCC 11, either set CC=gcc-11 CXX=g++-11 explicitly,
> >
> > I think you mean 12 instead of 11.
>
> yes, sorry about that.
No problem. That was the obvious one.
But what about my second and more important qu
tandard.
Is the same copy & paste error from the GCC 11 bug reports back then
as above or is this actually correct for GCC 12? Please clarify.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.or
er used (1)
> idA ksh93u+m -3284 kB 1.0.0~beta.1-1 1.0.0~beta.1-1
>
> while this package should have been considered manually installed
> due to step 3.
Correct, I can reproduce it, also with just pressing "U" again instead
of quitting, i.e. it seems as if
uildlib/docbook.mk
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ docbook-man-stamp: $(DOCBOOK_XML) aptitude-man.xsl
aptitude-common.xsl
@if [ -x "$(srcdir)/fixman" ]; then \
for i in $(DOCBOOK_MANS); do \
echo "$(srcdir)/fixman $$i"; \
- . $(srcdir)/fixman $$i; \
pkg 1.20.6, so I'm attaching the updated
> patch.
Thanks!
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B
architecture) and
> a version (of a package with version number & architecture).
[…]
Thanks for these explanations and clarifications, much appreciated!
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, f
ot;.
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
I wonder if this is a multiarch related bug since the case I mentioned
above was a cross-build and hence also has multiarch involved.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https:
quot;virtual" and I'm not sure which
terms should be used to distinguish between them. Aptitude calls the
latter usually "UNAVAILABLE" in the context of dependencies, but
something like "mentioned" or "referred to" seems more precise.
Rega
hence bloat.
Do you know of any other non-real package type than "virtual"?
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 532
other words: Within the Aptitude
team, I'm primarily the package maintainer and Manuel does nearly all
of the upstream development.)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `&#
Hi Greg,
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:06:45AM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > From my mind there are also some more possible states, which seem not
> > to be documented in the manual at all on a first glance. IIRC these
> > are:
> >
> > H or
dpkg doesn't know about.)
And then I vaguely remember that dpkg also knows the state
"half-installed" which is worse than "unconfigured" and usually
requires to purge the package first before reinstalling it. But I
forgot the letter for it. Maybe the capital H.
90 autobuild 1.2.4~autobuild
No more sure. Worked good enough for me, so I use it that way for
years now. :-)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 40
self. And
if I do, I usually use the web browser with the HTML variant.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 612
t. And nobody stated that aptitude will follow apt and not
apt-get. (Nobody has stated the opposite either, though, but it's
obviously the default.)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debia
are not even better for e.g. blind
people because they're actually "readable screenshots". And they're
scalable, too.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' |
Hi David,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> > So I guess what is intended here is more like:
> > | char * endptr;
> > | errno = 0;
> > | auto score_tweaks = strtol(action.c_str(), &endptr, 10);
> > | if (errno != 0 || *endptr != '\0')
>
> I applied the f
Package: aptitude-doc-en
Version: 0.8.13-2
Severity: minor
Documenting quickly as I'm currently busy with other stuff (namely
#982716) and I don't want that I forget about it:
Citing from
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/aptitude/ch02s03s05.en.html:
> the target “?section(non-free)” will selec
ed, but now another test
fails:
Test Results:
Run: 199 Failures: 1 Errors: 0
1) test: ResolverHintsTest::testHintParse (F) line: 147
../../tests/test_resolver_hints.cc
assertion failed
- Expression: h == t.h
- Checking 40 g++: tweak 0 ?exact-name("g++") installed == tweak 4
consolation I am also angry that I not only not managed
> to finish the fuzzing project in time, but also not managed to
> salvage the more useful bit in a more timely fashion either.
Actually, when I read that changelog summary, I just thought "Wow!" So
please please k
it still worked a few
weeks ago.
Wouldn't have expected this at this stage of the freeze. :-/ Wonder
who^Wwhat broke that.
Anyway, will investigate.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.c
t". And that's what it
is: minor. I do not expect that he expected us to fix that
immediately. So yes, we will have a look at and maybe fix it —
eventually.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Develo
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Hi Mikulas,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Will also try to setup an arm64 unstable on a Raspberry Pi and see if
> I can reproduce this.
Used aptitude on a Raspberry Pi 4 with arm64 for several weeks now
without a single crash.
Do you still experienc
unrelated.
Not necessarily. It's possible. But IMHO unlikely.
Since Julian has uploaded a fix as apt/2.1.18, would you mind checking
if you can still reproduce the issue in any way?
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert ,
dable Packages (65)
>
> instead of
>
> --- Upgradable Packages (61)
>
> Since the crashes are very sensitive to the system status, the
> above test might not be reliable.
Ack. That's now https://bugs.debian.org/980053 :-)
Regards, Axel
--
,'
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retile -2 aptitude-create-state-bundle should include more files from
file:/// URLs
Control: severity -2 minor
Control: submitter -2 Axel Beckert
Control: tag -2 - security
Hi Julian and Vincent,
Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > I got a first "segment
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi Vincent,
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2021-01-04 08:42:53 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Can you do an aptitude-create-state-bundle either before (preferred)
> > or after that situation and upload it somewhere?
>
> It's available here f
5 +1024 B 408 kB 1.46.1-1 1.46.1-2
i A gvfs-common 03632 kB 1.46.1-1 1.46.1-2
i A gvfs-daemons 1561 kB 1.46.1-1 1.46.1-2
i A gvfs-libs 0471 kB 1.46.1-1 1.46.1-2
Do you have any special /etc/apt/preferences* settings which might
play a
ew include without adding a proper dependency on
> libxxhash-dev to libapt-pkg-dev.
That's what I meant with "got lost" more or less. Thanks!
So this should be fixed in src:apt then? (Cc'ing our deities. ;-)
Otherwise I'd do a 0.8.13-3 upload with that b-d added.
t; >32 | #include
> > | ^~
> > compilation terminated.
> > make[6]: *** [Makefile:582: apt.o] Error 1
Looks like a missing dependency on libxxhash-dev on a first glance.
Will check if that helps. (And I wonder where that one got lost.)
Regards, Axel
--
,'&
t search nouveau
Sorting... Done
Full Text Search... Done
bumblebee/unstable,testing 3.2.1-26 amd64
NVIDIA Optimus support for Linux
[…]
W: Unable to read /etc/apt/preferences.d/foobar - open (13: Permission denied)
$
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://p
Hi Ahzo,
Ahzo wrote:
> # aptitude # select 'test-b' for installation, press g
> Uncaught exception: ../../src/ui.cc:1549: void auto_fix_broken(): Assertion
> "resman->resolver_exists()" failed.
Bingo! There it is. Thanks again!
Regards,
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Ahzo wrote:
> > the failure can be reliably reproduced with both the CLI (fatal
> > exception) and the TUI (assertion failure) in a minimal chroot
>
> Thanks for that! This makes it way easier to analyse this. Worked
> fine.
... on the co
s. Not sure yet.)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9
Control: tag -1 + pending
Dear Jidanni,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> > But what's the big deal? Why can't the program proceed if it isn't
> > present?
>
> Because tar trips over it.
Actually, aptitude-create-state-bundle still exits with 0 and the file
is still ge
uding /etc/apt/ in the
tar ball. Using "apt-config dump" whould just add completely
unnecessary complexity.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R
Manuel: What do you think of this variant?
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9
tanding and known issue in aptitude.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`-| 10
ut that said, this is merely a string replacement, shouldn't be
> problematic.
Ack, I think so, too.
I though think we should not merge it before that FTBFS is fixed.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Develop
_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>&
std::operator<<(std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>&,
std::basic_string_view<_CharT, _Traits>)’
/usr/include/c++/10/system_error:262:5: note: candidate: ‘template std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>&
std::operator<<(std::basic_ost
saves not all details of actions, e.g. it does only save
that you want to upgrade, but not to which version. Not sure what
happens if that version has a lower preference, it might even ignore
it as it can't find a version to upgrade to with higher preference.
Also not sure if there's ev
y
I feared that.
> and aptitude is the only package that uses it.
Ack. It was written for aptitude and no other software adopted it.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
rses or
slang?) applications crashing, too.
> So, it may be bug in the kernel and not aptitude. I
> bisected it, and it is caused by the kernel commit
> d27865279f12035c730818aa1a0280fada866a37.
This seems to be an arm64-only commit, so I assume this is really
arm64-specific.
ee if
I can reproduce this.
> This is the stacktrace of the crash:
Thanks for these details.
P.S.: I updated the bug title, just "aptitude" is not that much
helpful. ;-)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :
situation around chromium and ffmpeg where (dependency-wise)
you either can have ffmpeg from testing and chromium from unstable or
vice versa.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org
y\n' | aptitude | aha > aptitude.html
But actually the "[" had no effect.
asciinema might also be an option, too, but that's usually for videos
not for pictures. But we could freeze a frame and take a vector
screenshot then.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`.
ource tree, so I will try to replace
that one with your file.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
Control: tag -1 + pending
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Problem: It doesn't work for me, no more highlighting of new changelog
> entries — which I is why I haven't pushed my changes yet.
[...]
> You need to test it on upgradable packages. (And check how
> it looks withou
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> > > After some thought, I think a local aptitude-specific wrapper might be
> > > even better and obviates the question of whether dpkg-parsechangelog
> > > should be moved or not. :)
> >
> > FWIW, this makes sense to me.
>
end. But indeed, it FTBFS now. Hence
documenting it. Will fix that, too.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 61
ps fix this bug, but I would
> need some guidance regarding what/how to test :)
See above.
> > -dist_bin_SCRIPTS = aptitude-create-state-bundle aptitude-run-state-bundle
> > +dist_bin_SCRIPTS = apitude-changelog-parser \
> > + aptitude-create-state-bundle aptitude-run-state-bu
ions::
* APT::AutoRemove::RecommendsImportant (when set to false)
* APT::AutoRemove::SuggestsImportant (when set to false)
* Aptitude::Keep-Recommends (when set to false)
* Aptitude::Keep-Suggests (when set to false)
I though was not able to find a combination of these and
Aptitude::Purge-Unused to
Hi Julian,
sorry for not responding early, but it was a busy weekend for me.
Planned to work on your bug this evening, but you were quicker.
Seeing that it actually needed two uploads, I'm glad you looked at it
closer.
Thanks!
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel
must admit that this is anything but obvious, especially for people
not directly involved with Debian.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F
ture request then, retitling the bug report and
setting the severity to wishlist.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 C
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.12-3
Severity: normal
I use %i to show me in the aptitude package list which packages I have
pinned and which not.
Since at least 0.8.12-3 (maybe also 0.8.12-2, didn't check), i.e. the
patches for APT 2.0 (or linking against APT 1.9/2.0) this no more works
and even
uce this issue (package lists,
package states, aptitude settings, etc.) into a bzip2 compressed tar
archive given as parameter. It might become something between 20 and
200 MB, so it's usually not suitable for transfering by e-mail.
Uploading it somewhere and telling us (or just me if you don'
/556303
TL;DR: I can't reproduce this. For me, there is a difference of one
additional line—from Debian 8 Jessie up to Debian Sid.
I though found a related bug while doing so, reported at
https://bugs.debian.org/946458
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.12-1
Severity: minor
Control: found -1 0.8.11-7
Control: found -1 0.8.7-1
Control: found -1 0.6.11-1
This is more or less the findings from the comments of
https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/556038 and my answer at
https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/556303:
While "aptit
[ ERR] Writing extended state information
Thanks for that detail! That likely helps to track this down.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724
ing on a first glance...
If you can pinpoint one or more commits, I can cherry pick them and do
a quick upload to fix this issue.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `
press Enter on it ("[" would be another, probably more helpful
option) and then you got a list of all binary packages from that
source package.
Maybe we can ressurrect that feature from the 0.6.9 branch — in case
my recollection is correct.
Regards, Axel
--
,'&#
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.11-7
Severity: minor
Hi,
I just noticed that while the scroll-wheel works in the package list
view, it doesn't work after having pressed C to view the changelog of a
package.
This would be especially useful for packages with large changelog
entries like the kernel
glance. I though nowadays would probably replace
"-e" with "-E". But that's details.
But seeq also my reply to your mail in the thread of
https://bugs.debian.org/933128 — waiting for a reply there before
continuing here...
Regards, Axel
--
,'&#
Hi J.L.,
J. L. Lee wrote:
> In this case, Debian Wiki page on SourcesList
> (https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList) needs to be rephrased slightly.
Thanks for this hint!
Done now: https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList?action=diff&rev1=88&rev2=89
Regards, Axel
--
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo unreproducible + confirmed
Hi Matus,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 09.07.19 18:05, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > I assume you did not exit aptitude inbetween, right
>
> I did. What I did was:
Ok, exiting aptitude inbetween is what I usually do, to
111 of the 128 installed packages of the minimal chroot are updatable.
* 2 are unchanged between stretch and buster.
* 15 are no more in buster.
Maybe you can post even more verbose steps how to reproduce this.
Otherwise I have no idea what could be different with your setup to
cause such a differ
Control: found -1 0.8.11-7
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Sven Joachim wrote:
> > On 2017-07-03 08:14 -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > > While browsing around the view and marking packages for upgrade,
> > > aptitude crashed with the following exce
s a duplicate of #915246, #931536, and
#931543, hence merging. Please see my comments in these bug reports.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B
a fix which we then can also
apply to aptitude in Buster in the first minor update which is
expected in about a month.
The official workaround is to use "apt update" once inbetween, answer
its questions (with "y" :-) and then continue to use aptitude.
Regards, Axel
--
Hi Santiago,
Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 11:31:34AM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > > make[6]: *** [Makefile:412: download_progress.o] Error 1
> >
> > Will test later (once the dist-upgrade is through) with 8.3.0-5 from
> > unstable, too.
>
&g
e class F'
> struct quote3
> ^~
> make[6]: *** [Makefile:412: download_progress.o] Error 1
Will test later (once the dist-upgrade is through) with 8.3.0-5 from
unstable, too.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe
ion — answered:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2019/03/msg00043.html
Please also see
https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2019/03/msg00039.html
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.c
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
