Re: [aqm] Prefatory comments re draft-aqm-reccommendation and -evaluation, and a question

2014-01-22 Thread Fred Baker (fred)
No, you're not blowing smoke. I'm not sure I would compare the behavior to PMTUD, as in that the endpoint is given a magic number and manages to it, where in this case, it is given the results of its behavior, and it manages to improve that. But this is what I have rambled on about in threads

Re: [aqm] Prefatory comments re draft-aqm-reccommendation and -evaluation, and a question

2014-01-22 Thread Dave Taht
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Fred Baker (fred) f...@cisco.com wrote: No, you're not blowing smoke. I'm not sure I would compare the behavior to PMTUD, as in that the endpoint is given a magic number and manages to it, where in this case, it is given the results of its behavior, and it

Re: [aqm] Prefatory comments re draft-aqm-reccommendation and -evaluation, and a question

2014-01-22 Thread Dave Taht
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Fred Baker (fred) f...@cisco.com wrote: No, you're not blowing smoke. I'm not sure I would compare the behavior to PMTUD, as in that the endpoint is given a magic number and manages to it,