[aqm] publishing algorithms

2014-04-01 Thread Wesley Eddy
Hello AQMers. As chairs, Richard and I had been planning to let the evaluation guidelines converge and then use those to guide adoption of algorithm documents. However, we now think there may be value in not waiting so long, and getting some algorithm documents moving along more quickly. We

Re: [aqm] publishing algorithms

2014-04-01 Thread Michael Welzl
On 1. apr. 2014, at 14:11, Wesley Eddy w...@mti-systems.com wrote: Hello AQMers. As chairs, Richard and I had been planning to let the evaluation guidelines converge and then use those to guide adoption of algorithm documents. However, we now think there may be value in not waiting so

Re: [aqm] publishing algorithms

2014-04-01 Thread Fred Baker (fred)
Makes sense to me. I do have one question. Per charter, in December we are supposed to Submit first algorithm specification to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard”. Would this be a change of direction for the charter? Note that I’m not pushing a given algorithm, nor am I convinced that

Re: [aqm] publishing algorithms

2014-04-01 Thread Wesley Eddy
n 4/1/2014 12:34 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: Makes sense to me. I do have one question. Per charter, in December we are supposed to Submit first algorithm specification to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard”. Would this be a change of direction for the charter? Yes, it would be a