Hi Gorry,
Given QUIC includes FEC to hide losses, I guess it is a good example to
consider whether ECN still offers sufficient benefits over and above
just removing losses.
GF: And then, isn't the implication of AQM to significantly increase the
number of losses unless we use ECN?
On 08/29/2014 09:16 AM, Scheffenegger, Richard wrote:
Hi Gorry,
Given QUIC includes FEC to hide losses, I guess it is a good example to
consider whether ECN still offers sufficient benefits over and above
just removing losses.
GF: And then, isn't the implication of AQM to significantly
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Gorry Fairhurst go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk wrote:
OK, so I have many comments, see below.
Gorry
On 12/08/2014 10:43, Bob Briscoe wrote:
Wes, and responders so far,
A doc on the benefits and pitfalls of ECN is needed. Personally I
wouldn't assign much of my own
On 29/08/2014 14:52, David Collier-Brown wrote:
On 08/29/2014 09:16 AM, Scheffenegger, Richard wrote:
Hi Gorry,
Given QUIC includes FEC to hide losses, I guess it is a good example to
consider whether ECN still offers sufficient benefits over and above
just removing losses.
GF: And then,
