A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Active Queue Management and Packet Scheduling
Working Group of the IETF.
Title : AQM Characterization Guidelines
Authors : Nicolas Kuhn
Hi Gorry, all,
We have posted a -03 version that features Gorry’s comments and Gorry’s work
on making this document consistent with the recommendations document.
The major modifications in the -03 version are:
- one new multi-aqm scenario;
- a conclusive table that clearly states the
Sorry that I have not fully read Bob's report so I have been hesitating of
speaking up. Let me just comment on the following thread. I will spend more
time on Bob's detailed comments and give feedback later. For now, please see
inline…
Thanks,
Rong
From: Greg White
On 5/18/2015 10:00 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
LEDBAT was probably my first concern and area of research before
entering this project full time. I *knew* we were going to break
ledbat, but the two questions were: how badly? (ans: pretty badly) and
did it matter? (not that much, compared to saving
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Simon Barber si...@superduper.net wrote:
On 5/18/2015 10:00 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
LEDBAT was probably my first concern and area of research before entering
this project full time. I *knew* we were going to break ledbat, but the two
questions were: how badly?
On May 18, 2015, at 8:27 AM, Simon Barber si...@superduper.net wrote:
Shortly, our investigation confirms the negative interference: while AQM
fixes the bufferbloat, it destroys the relative priority among Cc protocols.
I think I would phrase that a little differently.
The concept of
