Re: [aqm] Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07

2017-03-21 Thread Yoav Nir
> On 22 Mar 2017, at 7:10, Jana Iyengar wrote: > > Thanks Yoav, Emma. I can try to move Sec 5 before Sec 3, if that helps. Thanks. I think it will. > Yoav: What do you suggest we add for security considerations? How about: OLD: There are no specific security exposures associated with CoDe

Re: [aqm] Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07

2017-03-21 Thread Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)
Hi, I can not agree more on this. It is well written, but I really think I can get the point of the draft faster if I can read the section 5 before section 3. Best Regards, Emma (Xuesong) -Original Message- From: aqm [mailto:aqm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yoav Nir Sent: Tuesday, M

[aqm] Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07

2017-03-21 Thread Yoav Nir
Reviewer: Yoav Nir Review result: Has Nits Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and