Re: [aqm] Status of the GSP AQM?

2017-12-15 Thread Francini, Andrea (Nokia - US/Murray Hill)
The paper we published at HPSR 2015 (http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7483103/ ) indeed emphasizes the application of GSP to high-speed links, where the simplicity of the scheme is most beneficial. If “conjunction with flow isolation” means combination of the algorithm with a flow queueing

Re: [aqm] Status of the GSP AQM?

2017-12-15 Thread Jonathan Morton
Reading the spec, it looks very much as though it's tuned for implementation in relatively simple, high-speed nodes. It doesn't look at all like it would work in conjunction with flow isolation, which is inherently a much more effective idea when feasible to deploy - which it should be at speeds

Re: [aqm] Status of the GSP AQM?

2017-12-15 Thread Francini, Andrea (Nokia - US/Murray Hill)
I know Wolfram is on vacation until January 8. I am sure he will provide input when he comes back. I believe the interest of the working group in GSP faded because there was not a public implementation available for testing. If the GSP version mentioned by Roland can be made public, it is

Re: [aqm] Status of the GSP AQM?

2017-12-15 Thread Bless, Roland (TM)
Hi Wesley, Am 14.12.2017 um 22:59 schrieb Wesley Eddy: > I mentioned GSP as a possible work item, back when we were discussing > rechartering, but apparently it was not compelling to the group at that > time. > > When we did the AQM algorithm adoption call ~2014, GSP appeared to be > basically