Dave Taht writes:
wow. It never registered to me that users might make a value judgement
based on the amount of ping loss, and in looking back in time, I can
think of multiple people that have said things based on their
perception that losing pings was bad, and that sqm-scripts was worse
I had spoken to someone at nznog that promised to combine mrtg +
smokeping or cacti + smokeping so as to be able to get long term
latency and bandwidth numbers on one graph. cc added.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Matt Taggart m...@lackof.org wrote:
Dave Taht writes:
wow. It never
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:17:33 +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson said:
We have a huge amount of information in our TCP stacks that either are
locked in there and not used properly to help users figure out what's
going on, and there is basically zero information flow between the
applications using TCP
