an IETF meeting coming
> up, I wanted to make sure the AQM WG status is clear.
>
> The final working group document (on CoDel) is now in IETF Last Call, on the
> main IETF list.
>
> AQM does not plan to meet in Chicago, and should be closed down as the CoDel
> draft becomes
I think there are no surprises here, but as there is an IETF meeting
coming up, I wanted to make sure the AQM WG status is clear.
The final working group document (on CoDel) is now in IETF Last Call, on
the main IETF list.
AQM does not plan to meet in Chicago, and should be closed down
Hi,
a new month, a new status report.
First of all, Wes and I as chairs would like to thank the editors who have
stepped forward to work on the AQM Evaluation Guideline draft. We are really
thankful for their burst of efforts in the last couple weeks!
We expect that that a document will be
Hi, as we've entered 2014 and have charter milestones that we're
working towards, Richard and I thought it would be good to start
periodically sending a status report to the WG mailing list so
that we can all keep up with what's going on, and focus our efforts
together on the things that need
I'm interested in contributing to the evaluation guidelines draft as writer
as expressed before, although I won't be able to actively work on this
earlier than the second week of Feb'14.
Regards,
Naeem
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Wesley Eddy w...@mti-systems.com wrote:
Hi, as we've
