Re: [aqm] Alia Atlas' Yes on draft-ietf-aqm-fq-implementation-03: (with COMMENT)

> On Oct 21, 2015, at 6:22 PM, Alia Atlas wrote: > > Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-aqm-fq-implementation-03: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC

Re: [aqm] Alia Atlas' Yes on draft-ietf-aqm-fq-implementation-03: (with COMMENT)

Fred, What I am saying is that I have worked with and verified implementations of Weighted Fair Queuing - and it is not Calendar Queues - certainly not as this draft describes it. Can you please provide a reference to what Weighted Fair Queues means - if it isn't Weighted Fair Queuing, or fix

Re: [aqm] Alia Atlas' Yes on draft-ietf-aqm-fq-implementation-03: (with COMMENT)

> On Oct 22, 2015, at 12:01 PM, Alia Atlas wrote: > > Fred, > > What I am saying is that I have worked with and verified implementations of > Weighted Fair Queuing - and it is not Calendar Queues - certainly not as this > draft describes it. Can you please provide a

[aqm] Alia Atlas' Yes on draft-ietf-aqm-fq-implementation-03: (with COMMENT)

Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-aqm-fq-implementation-03: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to