On 26 Feb, Rasool Al-Saadi wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to announce that we (myself and Grenville Armitage) released
> Dummynet AQM v0.1, which is an independent implementation of CoDel and
> FQ-CoDel for FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet framework, based on the IETF CoDel [1]
> and FQ-CoDel [2]
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-i...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> i...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Don Lewis
> Sent: Monday, 7 March 2016 7:41 AM
> To: Rasool Al-Saadi
> Cc: freebsd-...@freebsd.org; Grenville Armitage
> ; aqm@ietf.org; freebsd-i...@freebsd.org
> Subject:
On 2/27/16 9:53 AM, Polina Goltsman wrote:
>
>
> On 02/27/2016 06:21 PM, Dave Täht wrote:
>>
>> On 2/26/16 6:17 AM, Rasool Al-Saadi wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I would like to announce that we (myself and Grenville Armitage)
>>> released Dummynet AQM v0.1, which is an independent implementatio
On 02/28/2016 04:53, Polina Goltsman wrote:
[..]
Also, is it normal that NewReno resets its congestion window (to initcwnd)
after each packet loss aka.
More an artefact of FreeBSD's NewReno implementation temporarily overloading
the internal cwnd variable during FR/FR. Our cwnd trac
On 02/28/2016 04:21, Dave Täht wrote:
On 2/26/16 6:17 AM, Rasool Al-Saadi wrote:
[..]
Technical report:
http://caia.swin.edu.au/reports/160226A/CAIA-TR-160226A.pdf
In browsing this it appears that shaped rates were tested only (?).
Yes.
I am
curious what native performance (10,10
> On 27 Feb, 2016, at 19:53, Polina Goltsman
> wrote:
>
> Does CoDeL go into
> dropping more than one packet per RTT if the RTT is much smaller than an
> interval?
No - quite the opposite. It is more likely to drop more than one packet per
RTT when the actual RTT is *greater* than the interv
On 02/27/2016 06:21 PM, Dave Täht wrote:
On 2/26/16 6:17 AM, Rasool Al-Saadi wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to announce that we (myself and Grenville Armitage) released
Dummynet AQM v0.1, which is an independent implementation of CoDel and FQ-CoDel
for FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet framework, bas
On 2/26/16 6:17 AM, Rasool Al-Saadi wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to announce that we (myself and Grenville Armitage) released
> Dummynet AQM v0.1, which is an independent implementation of CoDel and
> FQ-CoDel for FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet framework, based on the IETF CoDel [1]
> and FQ
Dear all,
I would like to announce that we (myself and Grenville Armitage) released
Dummynet AQM v0.1, which is an independent implementation of CoDel and FQ-CoDel
for FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet framework, based on the IETF CoDel [1] and
FQ-CoDel [2] Internet-Drafts.
We prepared patches for FreeB
