[aqm] Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07

2017-03-25 Thread Fernando Gont
Reviewer: Fernando Gont Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For mo

Re: [aqm] Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07

2017-03-21 Thread Yoav Nir
> On 22 Mar 2017, at 7:10, Jana Iyengar wrote: > > Thanks Yoav, Emma. I can try to move Sec 5 before Sec 3, if that helps. Thanks. I think it will. > Yoav: What do you suggest we add for security considerations? How about: OLD: There are no specific security exposures associated with CoDe

Re: [aqm] Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07

2017-03-21 Thread Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)
, March 21, 2017 4:03 PM To: sec...@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-aqm-codel@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; aqm@ietf.org Subject: [aqm] Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07 Reviewer: Yoav Nir Review result: Has Nits Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effo

[aqm] Review of draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07

2017-03-21 Thread Yoav Nir
Reviewer: Yoav Nir Review result: Has Nits Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and