Wesley Eddy wrote:
>
> We didn't receive any comments yet on the updated recommendations
> draft, which we were trying to have a working group last call on
> per Richard's email to the list on 3/5.
Not sure how I missed that; but alas I did.
> Since we think people might not have noticed the
I still don't support wglc.
a) Nit: "Network Working Group"?
b) I have given up on using the term "AQM" to describe anything other
than Active Queue "Length" Management algorithms.
What I wrote about "SQM" is mostly outside the scope of the AQM
guidelines document, but it's here:
http://www.buf
We didn't receive any comments yet on the updated recommendations
draft, which we were trying to have a working group last call on
per Richard's email to the list on 3/5.
Since we think people might not have noticed the last call, we're
re-announcing it.
In the next two weeks, please review this
