Michael wrote:
> Yes, this was my plan. as Netscape 6 for Linux is real crap, I think
> importance of releasing really small and fast browser for Linux is
> high.
NS 6 under Win 95 seemed ok on the family computer (P120, 48MB RAM) but I
didn't use it much since win95 is really slow when used
> Glenn wrote:
> The reason why you were able to see them in NS 3.04g is that NS does
> not rely upon only content-type.
(snip)
But the point is that NS 3.x doesn't know about PNGs, it would seem odd to
me that they added support to recognize a PNG but not adding support for
viewing it.
//Bernie
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> How is Netscape 6 for Linux real crap? Is it very buggy, or is it just far too
> bloated? I won't be able to try it on present computer, Cx486DX2-S at 66 MHz
> with 20 MB RAM.
I haven't downloaded NS 6, but it seems to me that if I can
run 3 or 4
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, arachne-digest (actually Bernie) wrote:
> Nope, in short this is how Arachne is going to progress:
>
> Linux will be the main OS for the 2.x series, if someone (yours truly
> most likely) makes a 32-bit version for DOS that will follow along with
> the Linux version.
> The 1.
> On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> There exists only one "true DOS" OpenDos v7.01
> What about DR-DOS 7.03? I understand there wassome kind of
> problem with 7.02, but didn't that get fixed with 7.03?
> Or did they just leave things undone when they stopped
> developing it?
>IM
Clarence,
You made me drag out my PartitionMagic 4.0 manual. There is an operation,
"Resize Clusters" but on a cursory look it appears that it does that by
changing partition size. Quoting from the manual:
"The 'Resize Clusters' dialog [box] (Fig. 4.6) displays the possible cluster
sizes fr
Hi folks,
just checked 1.68.
ARGH! Memory monster is still alive with QNX pages, too.
Funny: pop3 mail download frees up memory.
Interesting: all versions eating up memory starting with less free memory
than good old 1.65.
Regards Joerg
-- This mail was written by user of Arachne, the Ultima
On Tue, 05 Dec 2000 10:51:04 +0200, Or Botton wrote:
> You said:
>> CL>But couldn't you give us the old interface back?
>> CL>Please unfix this feature in the next release!
> maybe its my eyes, screen, or just my brain, but I do not seem to
> be able to find a diffrence between the interfac
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000 03:23:13 -0500 (EST), Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Whatever happened to the Winsock interface for Arachne, as opposed to the DOS
> packet driver? Is that Winsock a dead issue?
If you mean Stub32.exe...
IMHO, that was an experiment that fell far short of its expectations.
I have
Hi folks,
On Sat, 02 Dec 2000 17:58:41 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> Watt-32 might get used in some future version of Arachne.
> For now we must stay with the 16bit WATTCP or we would be saying
> "goodbye" to those who are still using machines older than a 386.
Perhaps there could be 16bit and
Hi All;
I need to TEMPORARILY change the size of a partition with the intent
of modifying cluster size.
Could some Partition Magic fans tell me whether I should waste my time
looking for a demo download site ? In other words, will Partition Magic
allow ME to decide on cluster size ?
If anyone
Thomas Mueller said:
>Why would consumers want to continue getting the short end of the Windows
stick
>and stay with the DOS-based version? With WinME, MS is proving the
DOS-based
>version is just as much a resource hog as the NT-based version. I don't
like
>the idea of an OS just for consumer
Looking at the discusion I found that the small program that I use is stil
more feasable. Do not know how and where I got it but it is called bak.
I have put it in a directory in my path. When I give the command bak
filename.xxx it will search all drives, directories and subdirectories for
files
Tue, 05 Dec 2000 19:38:04 -000 schrieb Mike Millen:
> SM>MM> The square buttons are nice, as are the new colours,
> SM>New Colours? Interesting, but not on my grayscale LCD. :-)
> SM>What colours?
> Nothing major... the Back and Forward arrows are blue instead
> of green. Nice, though. :)
coo
Just got a duplicate release announcement. That because of the virus
attack mentioned previously?
Terri
SM>MM> The square buttons are nice, as are the new colours,
SM>New Colours? Interesting, but not on my grayscale LCD. :-)
SM>What colours?
Nothing major... the Back and Forward arrows are blue instead
of green. Nice, though. :)
Mike
Clarence Verge wrote:
>
> Just like the Linux commands that won't do anything
> useful unless you can remember what the switches are.
There's no need to remember the switches -- just use
an alias. For example, I alias 'ls -al' to 'dir'.
Cheers,
Steven
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:05:12 +0100, Florian Xaver wrote:
> How does need them??
You'll be suprised.
I could really use Arachne when i'm on Windows. Usually i'm running
a DOS prompt on full-screen mode, and it would be nice if I could just
use windows's allready set-up connection to use Arachne a
I'm surprised, in the ``whereis'' discussion, nobody mentioned a very
recent flavor of whereis called locate, that has been under active
development for a few years: long file name support, goto to file
found, execute macros or command(s) on found file, search through
multiple drives, runs on mos
To answer your question,
On Mon, 04 Dec 2000 23:34:01 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter) wrote:
> I'm really asking myself what you do with my posts ...
> I have written this the umpteenth time ...
I *read* them. Perhaps you don't.
I even make a point of quoting the precise pa
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:28:46 -0500 (EST), Sam Ewalt wrote:
> Listen, you guys can tie yourself in knots if you want to--but
> Lineo just doesn't care about single copy usage. The minimum they
> want to sell is fifty at a pop. Doesn't that tell you something?
I was trying to keep my mouth shut =D
On Tue, 05 Dec 2000 10:51:04 +0200, Or Botton wrote:
> maybe its my eyes, screen, or just my brain, but I do not seem to
> be able to find a diffrence between the interface between 1.66 and 1.68?..
> I'm curious. Whats the diffrence, exactly?
Press F5 a couple of times in each, Or; you'll
>Whatever happened to the Winsock interface for Arachne, as opposed to the
DOS
>packet driver? Is that Winsock a dead issue?
>
How does need them??
Bye, Florian Xaver
www.drdos.org
www.seal.de.vu
Sam,
I am going to search my PC Magazines for whereis.com (the version that I use).
Simtel has PC Magazine archives by volume and number and that should include
the whereis.com. In the meantime, if you want it, let me know and I will
send it to you.
Roger Turk
Tucson, Arizona USA
P.S. Are
Listen, you guys can tie yourself in knots if you want to--but
Lineo just doesn't care about single copy usage. The minimum they
want to sell is fifty at a pop. Doesn't that tell you something?
There is no "market" for single copy DOS sales. The only viable market
is for embedded sytems and vari
Hi
05 Dec 2000, Christof Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CL> there is a file toolbar.tb. In the first lines it says that you must
CL> not be afraid of the syntax:
CL> What is this file good for (apart from intimidating people by
CL> syntax)?
It defines the look of the arachne toolbar ;)))
Hi
05 Dec 2000, "Thomas Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TM> Whatever happened to the Winsock interface for Arachne, as opposed to
TM> the DOS packet driver? Is that Winsock a dead issue?
good question ... I wanted to ask that myself ! (stub32 ?)
There is another alternative IMHO, there s
Ho list,
there is a file toolbar.tb. In the first lines it says that you must
not be afraid of the syntax:
;This is Advanced Arachne Toolbar definition file 1999-06-22
xChaos
;=
;Syntax: V|H+page+id icon_code KEY|URL|TB
Hi
04 Dec 2000, Sam Ewalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> could you tell me where you have read that ??
SE> www.lineo.com/cgi-bin/drdos/faq
SE> says that you can download a copy for non-commercial use
SE> at www.drdos.org
Yepp ... you're right ...
maybe they should update their license ...
be
Mon, 04 Dec 2000 20:25:34 -000 schrieb Mike Millen:
> SM>>CV> My favorite Arachne frame is gone. :(
> SM>>CV> What do I hafta do to get it back ?
> SM>MP> You don't like the new one ? :-O I thought you will like that you
> SM>MP>have more screen size available...
> SM>I like it. But it would be
Or Botton said:
>... maybe its my eyes, screen, or just my brain, but I do not seem to
>be able to find a diffrence between the interface between 1.66 and 1.68?..
Ok.. i'm answering my own e-mail, which is silly, but i've just found
it as well by changing to "almost full screen mode". It LOOKS ni
You said:
> CL>But couldn't you give us the old interface back?
> CL>Please unfix this feature in the next release!
... maybe its my eyes, screen, or just my brain, but I do not seem to
be able to find a diffrence between the interface between 1.66 and 1.68?..
I'm curious. Whats the diffrence, e
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 18:01:34 +0100, [???] wrote:
> [Attached file: EIOOABEI.EXE]
What's THAT thing seposed to be?..
I've just received it from the arachne mailing list, with no from or
to fields. And obviously i'm not going to run this file..
>Just a comment here. When they released Windows 2000, Microsoft was already
>telling the business community that Win95/98 would not be upgraded again,
>and they needed to start the transition to the NT line. I think the user
>community as a whole said-- no --and hence we see the arrival of Wi
Whatever happened to the Winsock interface for Arachne, as opposed to the DOS
packet driver? Is that Winsock a dead issue?
MP>MM> PLEASE Michael, put all the new buttons on the
MP>MM> right of the screen (in two lines).
MP>it will be 4th screen layout, ok.
Great news! Thank you. :)
Mike
GM>Personally, I prefer *this* layout to all others.
GM>http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/layout.jpg
GM>This allows me to keep-an-eye-on memory usage at-all-times.
(Tuesday 7:40 GMT)
I went for a look but Angelfire couldn't find it. :(
Is it still there?
Mike
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:06:37 -0500, Roger Turk wrote:
> Another search that I did found a file that seems to be similar to the
> Whereis.com that I have, but is called FF (for file finder) and is a 1991
> program.
I registered my version of FF. Great program for MS-DOS! Unfortunately,
it doesn'
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:02:21 -0500 (EST), Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> Now Caldera/Lineo is no longer selling DR-DOS except in lots of 50 or more
>> copies. So where does that leave the notion of single-copy shareware?
> You don't have to buy it for single cop
39 matches
Mail list logo
