As I am reading the Arachne digest I don't know who asked but here is
what I know about this subject.
PCMCIA modems are real modems and have no connections with Win crap.
They function as an external modem and I have never had to use a
modem driver or such. In order to recognize the card on your
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001 02:54:10 -0800 (PST),
Howard Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My corporate ISP just installed what the level-1 techs call a ``spam
> filter'' for the SMTP mail server. As a result, this server refuses
> to send mail out to anyone not already in its domain, unless my
> ma
On Sat, 3 Feb 01 17:16:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Howard Schwartz) wrote:
> Sam asked:
>> So my question is: Why does one need to authenticate himself to his own
>> system's smtp server? They already know who you are and they know you are
>> OK because you are already logged on to their own syst
This is in Response to glenn (because I can't find your email addy)
Yes I would REALLY! like the disk image it would be something very fun to
play with!
Thanks alot,
Zach ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Sat, 03 Feb 2001 12:52:32 +, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> authentication protocol, but unless you are connected to "shentel.net" I
> don't think there is any way you can send a message out of
> "smtp.shentel.net" unless you have obtained some subscriber's username and
> password and have u
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001 12:57:05 -0500 (EST), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> Everything seems to be working just fine at 800x600 Hicolor
>> (including horizontal scrolling of the page)
>> http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/ok_here.zbm
>> You'll ne
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001 13:14:53 -0500 (EST), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Clarence Verge wrote:
>> 4) The horizontal scroll problem doesn't go away for ME in Hicolor mode.
>>At least with A1.62. BRB.
>>Nope. It doesn't scroll sideways for me in A1.70 either. (Hico
On Sat, 03 Feb 2001 22:44:05 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Feb 2001 06:40:40 +0200, Or Botton wrote:
>> Hm.
>> Well, they got the browser with the biggest screen... that can
>> show several sites at once. :)
> Arachne *can* show several sites at once. ;-)
> (proof attached)...
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001 22:13:17 -0800, Zach Campbell wrote:
> Would any one know where I could get ahold of PCMCIA drivers for dos? I'm
> turned the net upside down lookin for them and can't find them anywhere, On
> the itty bitty I'm usin a cardnal 14.4 external right now..
Hello Zach:
I have look
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 23:49:46 -0800, Zach Campbell wrote:
> I had a bit of a thought and thought maybe there was some one here with the
> same twisted ideas..
> I have been working on a machine that I've dubbed the "Itty Bitty" It is
> essentially a 486/66 with 16 megs of ram it's out of a laptop
On Sat, 03 Feb 2001 06:40:40 +0200, Or Botton wrote:
> Hm.
> Well, they got the browser with the biggest screen... that can
> show several sites at once. :)
Arachne *can* show several sites at once. ;-)
(proof attached)...
--
Glenn
(your friendly neighborhood compu-nerd)
http:
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001 3:39:22 +0800, J. J. Young wrote:
> http://www.netbility.com/Images/TS2000P-03Img007.gif
Ha !!!
They think *that's* big ???
Here's all I have to say about *that* !!! ;-)
http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/big-scrn.htm
--
Glenn
(your friendly neighborhood compu-nerd)
Would any one know where I could get ahold of PCMCIA drivers for dos? I'm
turned the net upside down lookin for them and can't find them anywhere, On
the itty bitty I'm usin a cardnal 14.4 external right now..
Sam asked:
> So my question is: Why does one need to authenticate himself to his own
> system's smtp server? They already know who you are and they know you are
> OK because you are already logged on to their own system by using a
> username and a password that they have already authorized a
> On 2 Feb 01 at 23:39, owner-arachne-digest@arachne wrote:
> Christian, Clarence, all,
> I apologize, my quoted description did not apply to DOS Navigator
> (ND), but to the Russian Necromancer's DOS Navigator (NDN). I really
> recommend that one to everybody who wants to upgrade from No
Sam asked:
> So my question is: Why does one need to authenticate himself to his own
> system's smtp server? They already know who you are and they know you are
> OK because you are already logged on to their own system by using a
> username and a password that they have already authorized a
> On 2 Feb 01 at 23:39, owner-arachne-digest@arachne wrote:
> Christian, Clarence, all,
> I apologize, my quoted description did not apply to DOS Navigator
> (ND), but to the Russian Necromancer's DOS Navigator (NDN). I really
> recommend that one to everybody who wants to upgrade from Nor
On Sat, 03 Feb 2001 15:54:06 -0500, Clarence Verge wrote:
> Hi Bart;
> It looks like I hafta put smiley faces at the end of my jokes. :(
> Just imagine:
> Wouldn't it be great if the best piece of sotware ever written, output
> these lines in text mode on almost everyone's screen when started ?
On Sat, 03 Feb 2001 17:02:51 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> My understanding of smtp servers is that they just relay the mail,
> nothing is kept on the server and you can't get anything from the
> server, all it does is take the mail you send it and sends it on
> its way. There is no need for secur
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Clarence Verge wrote:
> It appears that I "ticked" you off.
Not at all. Perhaps my attempt to be "concise" was mistaken for
"curt." If so, I'm sorry you took it that way.
> Almost all the points you made are valid and true.
Generally, I don't bother trying to make po
My understanding of smtp servers is that they just relay the mail,
nothing is kept on the server and you can't get anything from the
server, all it does is take the mail you send it and sends it on
its way. There is no need for security, imho.
Restricting mail delivery from traditional smtp se
Steve wrote:
>
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Clarence Verge wrote:
> Not rehashed to save bandwidth.
Hi Steve;
It appears that I "ticked" you off.
It was probably my subject line, written when I thought I knew what I was
talking about, but amended later. In a daze of glory, I thought my 12 sec
.ZBM ex
Flip ter Biecht wrote:
>
> > Sorry. Operation under Windows (tm) is not supported.
>
> (Sorry Clarence, You're wrong this time: Even I myself have supported
> Arachne installations under various windows, and I've even been installing
> OS/2 warp 3, just to see...) And then again, You might have
Christof Lange wrote:
>...Russian Necromancer's DOS Navigator (NDN). I really
>recommend that one to everybody who wants to upgrade from Norton
>Commander to a really advanced file manager. It is, however,
>difficult to download, because the homepage and archive seem to load
>only with difficulti
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 23:39:56 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (arachne-digest) wrote:
>
> arachne-digestFriday, February 2 2001Volume 01 : Number 1441
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 21:13:52 -0500
> From: "G
unsubscribe
Hi Gangue, and BERNIE
That xswap thing is still around, and Bernie, you asked what needs to be
fixed!
This is definitely one thing that needs fixing in the download. There
are over 130 people each week accessing my (badly needing updated)
arachne4dos pages here in the UK.
I suspect quite a few
On Sat, 03 Feb 2001 16:17:05 +0100, Flip ter Biecht wrote:
> Sam: Are you sure that your win95 "configuration screen -> system -> device
> manager -> modems" (may not be too accurate translation from win95 dutch
> version...) dialog box doesn't offer any optional dos support? (I found
> mine on
On Sat, 03 Feb 2001 09:52:51 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2001 02:54:10 -0800 (PST), Howard Schwartz wrote:
>> My corporate ISP just installed what the level-1 techs call a ``spam
>> filter'' for the SMTP mail server. As a result, this server refuses
>> to send mail out to anyone not
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001 02:54:10 -0800 (PST), Howard Schwartz wrote:
> My corporate ISP just installed what the level-1 techs call a ``spam
> filter'' for the SMTP mail server. As a result, this server refuses
> to send mail out to anyone not already in its domain, unless my
> mail transport software
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001 16:09:59 +0100, "florianx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Homepage of Necromancer's DOS Navigator
>>http://www.necromancer.newmail.ru/
>>http://www.necromancer.newmail.ru/download.htm
> The latest version is from 05/2000. Why so old??
I was unsuccessful in my attempts
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Clarence Verge wrote:
> Four points of possible interest.
>
> 1) Your ISP apparantly isn't as co-operative as mine.
>It came down as text/plain.
> 2) It downloaded in 26 sec. - the png took me approx 52 sec.
>BTW, I'm awake this time. ;-)
Since you downloaded both
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:54:11 -0500 (EST), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Clarence Verge wrote:
>
> >> I went off half-cocked there: that included the download time !
> >> But I was pretty sure it didn't when I wrote it. arrr
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> Everything seems to be working just fine at 800x600 Hicolor
> (including horizontal scrolling of the page)
> http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/ok_here.zbm
>
> You'll need to save it as ok_here.zip and then unzip it if you don't
> have the .ZBM "pl
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Bernie wrote:
> Steve wrote:
> > Did you know that *.bmp is "Windows Bitmap" format?
>
> I thought they originated from OS/2 (but there's some diffrence between
> an OS/2 and a Windows bitmap). But since Windows is a "clone" of OS/2 it
> would seem natural that OS/2 had BMP
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Clarence Verge wrote:
> We have placed ourselves in the "select" catagory just by using Arachne.
> That unselect "majority" isn't taking part in any attempt to improve things.
> They just go wherever the ride takes them. I have no personal interest in
> reaching them with ZBM
>Homepage of Necromancer's DOS Navigator
>
>http://www.necromancer.newmail.ru/
>http://www.necromancer.newmail.ru/download.htm
>
The latest version is from 05/2000. Why so old??
Bye, Florian
"Oisdaunn, passt's auf...und losst's eich nix gfoin!!"
-- Club Dr-DOS - the unofficial Lineo Dr-
>>> Sorry. Operation under Windows (tm) is not supported.
>(Sorry Clarence, You're wrong this time: Even I myself have supported
Arachne installations under various windows, and I've even been installing
OS/2 warp 3, just to see...) And then again, You might have used the
opportunity to sell me a
Absolutely great!
It took me some time to find the command line options, and now the video
stops at 800x600x256 (higher resolutions give a xwindow style virtual
screen, but without the moveability of linux' mouse support), and it won't
work under win95, but it puts arachne back on the list of use
Thanks Steve,
again it was easy when someone knows what to do.
There is an other file in the SuSE-loadlin -linux.par-
I put the name of the new kernel there and all runs fine.
regards Joerg
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001 02:54:10 -0800 (PST), Howard Schwartz wrote:
> My corporate ISP just installed what the level-1 techs call a ``spam
> filter'' for the SMTP mail server. As a result, this server refuses
> to send mail out to anyone not already in its domain, unless my
> mail transport software
And just another addition:
The filemanager with the built-in HTML-viewer (I mentioned it under
2a) as CONNECT or CN) is correctly called "The IBM HandShaker Version
7.5". I have just realized that its instructions are in Russian, too.
But do not be afraid, you probably will not need to read t
On 2 Feb 01 at 23:39, owner-arachne-digest@arachne wrote:
>Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 21:36:10 +0200 (EET)
>From: Cristian Burneci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: File manager features
>
>Christof Lange wrote:
>
>>b) NDN, DN, DOS Navigator (Clarence mentioned it)
>
>>There several different version
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001 02:58:26 -0500 (EST), Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> Yes, no problem wiewing .MES or .CNM files offline, except for once in
>> a blue moon when my index scheme becomes farkled. (See my recent reply
>> to Ron Clarke on what to do about this.)
> Sam Heywood,
> I get Arachne Load Er
Hi folks,
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 23:16:07 -0500 (EST), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to New Deal. I assume they're still using Motif for their desktop
> as well.
Yes, that's right. In the newer versions (since 3.0 I think) there is a
driver for a W9x style GUI but this looks ugly :-).
Rega
Hi folks,
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001 02:54:10 -0800 (PST), Howard Schwartz wrote:
> Can any one help me figure out if I can tweak my old SMTP programs to
> provide some form of this authentication? I was hoping this might be
> done with some varient of the traditional `HELO' command, or by
> first logg
Hi Zach and all,
just for fun I created a directory and put in the following things:
Volume in drive E is DISK1_VOL3
Directory of E:\HILF
. 3.02.01 14:10
..3.02.01 14:10
RAR CFG 361 8.04.00 20:31
RAR EXE 102989 2.10.98 13:09
EMM386 EX
Hi
03 Feb 2001, Howard Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HS> Can any one help me figure out if I can tweak my old SMTP programs to
HS> provide some form of this authentication?
IMHO not possible ... sorry :(
PS: Also old fashioned POP3 password is cr*p.
Sending passwords in the clear over t
L.D wrote:
> They shouldn't had oughta done that. };>
You missed commenting on the fact that their browser isn't the first
multitasking one ;-)
//Bernie
http://bernie.arachne.cz/
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 23:16:07 -0500 (EST), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GEOS was the Graphical Environment Operating System used on
> the Commodore 64 (it was on something before that, but I forget
> what) developed at Berkeley. Then it was ported to x86 and
> became PC/GEOS, and somewhere
>Yes, no problem wiewing .MES or .CNM files offline, except for once in
>a blue moon when my index scheme becomes farkled. (See my recent reply
>to Ron Clarke on what to do about this.)
Sam Heywood,
I get Arachne Load Error when trying to view a named .MES file, so index scheme
shouldn't be in
52 matches
Mail list logo
