SETI [was Re: Against M$ {Re: Some of you might be interested

2002-04-10 Thread L.D. Best
Very commendable indeed!! 95th percentile is not to be sneezed at! I plan on joining once the dozerware system is up; since I'm allowed 2 IPs, I can have both machines going at the same time ... and with cable modem any data transfer times will be minimal, which the 1.2GHz processor should be abl

Why M$? [was Re: Against M$ {Re: Some of you might be interested

2002-04-10 Thread L.D. Best
Ô( system for DOS stuff. This MMX-233 system will remain pristine, and Arachne will be used for all e-mail applications. I've been assured by some that there *are* "safe" e-mail programs out there for dozerware, but I prefer Arachne -- it is well behaved. As to Linux ... I really don't have ti

Re: no more "old indexes"....

2002-04-10 Thread Clarence Verge
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 20:15:41 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote: > I can't believe that we didn't think of this a looonnnggg time ago. > Edit idxfast.htp and idxhead.htp > Just below add this line. > > There you go: > No more "old indexes". :))) Very nice Batman ! I guess we've been a bit too bu

Re: DOSCIM extant

2002-04-10 Thread Daniel Pruitt
Really, cool. I guess the last time I tried to log on was via terminal prog. I liked having my 600k storage spot he he all I used CSI for was weather, headlines and some forums, since "I" couldn't pop3. I never could get that virtual key thing to work on my win3.1 anyway. I might have to

no more "old indexes"....

2002-04-10 Thread Glenn McCorkle
I can't believe that we didn't think of this a looonnnggg time ago. Edit idxfast.htp and idxhead.htp Just below add this line. There you go: No more "old indexes". :))) -- Glenn http://arachne.cz/ http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/ http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm

Re: Some of you might be interested

2002-04-10 Thread Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ
On Tue, 09 Apr 2002 18:38:51 -0400, L.D. Best wrote: > I haven't been on the list lately because it's all been Linux and I'm > still in the process of figuring out how I'll protect my Win98SE > machine once I get it up on line. I need semi-reliable full time web > access before I start setting

Re: Against M$ {Re: Some of you might be interested

2002-04-10 Thread Steve
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Richard Menedetter wrote: > LB> how can SETI At Home and the cancer research thing > LB> work? > Seti Searches ExtrateresTrial Intelligence :) http://iosef.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?[EMAIL PROTECTED]&cmd=user_stats :-) - Steve

Re: Against M$ {Re: Some of you might be interested

2002-04-10 Thread anarkisseD
At 02:06 PM 4/10/2002, you wrote: >I want to protect it against itself! I want to boot to DOS without >having to use F8. I want to make certain any "messaging" software >doesn't open up a back door that others can send files through. etc etc > > >I hate M$ ... I really REALLY hate Microsoft. >

Against M$ {Re: Some of you might be interested

2002-04-10 Thread Richard Menedetter
Hi L! 10 Apr 2002, "L.D. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What do you protect your win98 against ?? >> Win98 has no open ports (if samba has been disabled) >> if somebody wants to connect to you, he will get a ICMP Port >> unreachable. LB> I want to protect it against itself! I want to

Against M$ {Re: Some of you might be interested

2002-04-10 Thread L.D. Best
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:56:22 +0200 (CEST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter) wrote: > What do you protect your win98 against ?? > Win98 has no open ports (if samba has been disabled) > if somebody wants to connect to you, he will get a ICMP Port unreachable. I want to protect it against its

Some of you might be interested

2002-04-10 Thread Richard Menedetter
Hi L! 09 Apr 2002, "L.D. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: LB> My oldest sent me the URL, with a "check it out." I'm not yet in a LB> position to need [hence need to know about] this type of protection, LB> but some of you may well be. Snort is a free Intrusion Detection System. It per se off