On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 15:04:52 -0500, Dean Coffey wrote, regarding the
contents of BEOS.INS, or whatever the name of that darned file was:
> alert --warning "Install unrar, edit your expander.rules to have Expander
> support RAR archives, and register the 'application/x-rar' MIME type?" \
>
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 23:46:12 -0400 (EDT), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> I don't think being a registered user binds you to a specific version. Don't
>> the privileges of being a registered user carry forward to all later versions,
>> just the s
Hi Day,
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 22:14:04 -0500, Day Brown wrote:
> The latest version is about 500k, of which only 20k are the
> actual executables, the rest for some sample .jpgs and the
> text itself. What it does, at the text mode dos prompt is:
> -changes to 50 line mode. cant do that with linux
The latest version is about 500k, of which only 20k are the
actual executables, the rest for some sample .jpgs and the
text itself. What it does, at the text mode dos prompt is:
-changes to 50 line mode. cant do that with linux unless you are root.
-runs ANSI.COM which only installs if needed.
-
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 14:21:30 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> There will always be something else to fix and improve!! It could be
> an endless quest for pefection.
> Of course maybe that's a better way than release and revise and
> then revise again as in the past where we'd get three or four
> new v
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 08:16:05 -0500
"Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for posting the URLs.
>
> Went to those places and got the files. The files UNRAR250.ZIP
> and and RARX290.ZIP are not for DOS. They are for Windows
> "DOS-boxes". UNRAR250.ZIP doesn't even contain a co
>I can't email it because I can't figure out the true name of the file.
>It "appears" to be named BEOS.INS, but that is just the illusion. I
>believe it has some strange character hidden in the file name, but I
>haven't been able to guess what that character might be. If you want
>the file you c
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 13:29:52 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
> It means I try to keep Glenn's spirits up while he tries to make yet
> another (and another) change before releasing it.
> I'm the great delayer.
There will always be something else to fix and improve!! It could be
an endless quest f
Sam,
If you do, "unrar /?|more" with the installed version of 2.50, you will see
that UNRAR.EXE is FREEWARE. The RAR.EXE part is shareware.
There is also a new version of RAR --- 3.00.
There are versions [shutter] WINRAR, DOS & OS/2, and Linux. Although the DOS
version is named RAR32.EXE
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 12:47:40 -0400, Roger Turk wrote:
> Sam,
> I have RAR250.EXE and just "installed" it. (Can't remember where or when I
> got it, but think it was in the past year.) It is for DOS. I got it when
> there was a discussion on this list about RAR and think that I found it by
> d
On Mon, 17 Jun 2002 07:12:01 +, Ray Andrews wrote:
> But, but, Arachne is writen in C, no? If Clarence is helping with the
> next update, dosen't that mean ...
That means nothing either sinister like "Clarence is learning C"
or impossible like "Clarence is converting it to ASM" !
It mea
Sam,
I have RAR250.EXE and just "installed" it. (Can't remember where or when I
got it, but think it was in the past year.) It is for DOS. I got it when
there was a discussion on this list about RAR and think that I found it by
doing a google search on "RAR".
No BEOS.INS file in install.
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 08:21:49 -0500, Dean Coffey wrote:
> {snip}
>> WARNING: If anyone should download UNRAR250.ZIP you would
>> be well advised not to unzip it to a directory on your hard
>> drive. This zip file contained a 654 byte file named BEOS.INS,
>> or something similar, that I could not
> Glenn McCorkle and Clarence Verge and several others are putting
> together an Arachne for DOS update. (If you notice Glenn uses
> Arachne 1.71 as his mailer. He now describes it as "stable."
But, but, Arachne is writen in C, no? If Clarence is helping with the
next update, dosen't that mean
{snip}
>WARNING: If anyone should download UNRAR250.ZIP you would
>be well advised not to unzip it to a directory on your hard
>drive. This zip file contained a 654 byte file named BEOS.INS,
>or something similar, that I could not figure out how to delete
>by any method other than by resorting t
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 03:29:15 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I feel your pain...
> http://www.winimage.com/extract.htm
> ftp://ftp.sac.sk/pub/sac/pack/unrar250.zip
> 32bit;
> ftp://ftp.sac.sk/pub/sac/pack/rarx290.exe
Thanks for posting the URLs.
Went to those places and got the files. The f
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 09:45:55 +, Ron Clarke wrote:
> Hi folks,
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 20:07:22 +, "Edenyard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:25:16 +00, Bastiaan Edelman asked:
>>> BTW I know Joerg is using Picture View, a German DOS prog for viewing,
>>> converting, e
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 18:23:28 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How large is the (stripped) binary?
> I'd like to compile it for BasicLinux if it is not
> too large.
X version is:
sodjiin:/$ du -h /usr/bin/links
688k/usr/bin/links
gooday,
sodjiin
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 16:25:56 -0500
"Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 21:55:20 -0700, "Destiny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Previous discussions inquired of locating old dos install files.
> > http://386page.gooddays.org has dos/windows/os2/deskview of var
19 matches
Mail list logo
