On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 15:58:04 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Although I agree with the core of your argument, I think it's misplaced.
> The dialog is bigger than just javascript or the *evil schemes of a
> corporate giant*. The fight isn't against M$ or for Arachne - it's a
> fight to allow peo
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 18:38:38 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> We need programmers who have better abilities than mine.
Somehow Arachne needs to become a "project" that will attract
new talent and an influx of ability and energy.
There is a large pool of DOS programmers involved in the FreeDOS
pr
Hopefully this message will show MY e-dress as the source
.. having to use webmail at present on w2k platform has led
to some strange happenings
Just wanted to let you know that even if "M$ takes over the
entire world of the internet" they won't own it. I know
(don't ask how) that there is a
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 20:50:40 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> Correct it I'm wrong, but I thought M$h** spent all its time building
>> patches for security breaches ... ;-)
> Only half.
> The other half is spent finding ways to block other browsers. :((
Well, it is certainly not blocking them ver
programmers who have better abilities than mine.
Two of them come to mind right-off-the-bat.
Bernie and Clarence.
Yup. 'nuf said.
later,
rick
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:52:00 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
>> Since it *IS* a fact that MS continually adjusts its code to make
>> itself the only safteware available that recognizes the new MS satadard.
> Hmmm... there's an inconsistency there.
> If M$ adjusts the code, they have to get the ISPs to
Hi again,
I've started to get webspace going for the re-furbed arachne4dos website and
discovered the old webring don't appear to work? Anyone know if it does or not and
where it is nowadays if it does work?
On another subject, but related, how does arachne cope with *.asp files? or not at
all
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 06:53:38 -0500,
=?windows-1252?Q?Jos=E9=20Antonio=20Pineda=20Figueroa?=
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> c:\>for %f in (*.mes *.txt *.c my_fil*.*) do find "hello world" %f
I've used a similar construction many times. The problem is that the
return from the FIND command is always
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 09:41:57 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
>> I edited my cookie file and removed the extraneous ';' situated between
>> "path=/;" and "domain=."
>> I just now succesfully posted a test message to the members chat area.
> That's interesting. I wonder what it means. Is a solution
