On 14 Apr 02 at 15:22, owner-arachne-digest@arachne wrote:
>Reply to Sender: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (howard schwartz)
>Reply to List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I was told that dos7 that comes, at least with win95 has certain ``powers''
>the last ``real dos'' does not: a) dos5 and dos7 copy an
OK, that does it!! I'll find that cancer research place or whatever,
and link into them. With you two working SETI they don't need me! };>
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002 20:29:04 -0500, david <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [resend]
> Steve wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Richard Menedetter wrote:
>
[resend]
Steve wrote:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Richard Menedetter wrote:
> LB> how can SETI At Home and the cancer research thing
> LB> work?
> Seti Searches ExtrateresTrial Intelligence :)
http://iosef.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?[EMAIL PROTECTED]&cmd=user_stats
:-)
- Steve
http://iosef.ssl.berk
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 19:19:44 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 23:37:19 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> So, my question is:
>> Exactly what is it that you can't do with Arachne?
>> Whatever those items might be.
>> I'll bet you dollars to donuts that we can figure-out
>> a way of do
(this is a resend)
Pleas forgive the duplicate if it *did* get through the first time.
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 16:03:10 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
> Things are changing rather quickly these days, Glenn ..
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 23:37:19 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> On Wed, 10
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002 19:51:58 +0200 (CEST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter)
wrote:
> Hi howard!
> 12 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (howard schwartz) wrote:
> hs> I was told that dos7 that comes, at least with win95 has certain
> hs> ``powers'' the last ``real dos'' does not: a) dos5 and d
Hi howard!
12 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (howard schwartz) wrote:
hs> I was told that dos7 that comes, at least with win95 has certain
hs> ``powers'' the last ``real dos'' does not: a) dos5 and dos7 copy and
hs> move files faster than dos 6.22 b) dos7 supports fat32 which saves
hs> wasted
Hi L!
10 Apr 2002, "L.D. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SETI@Home]
LB> I plan on joining once the dozerware system is up;
Seti has a big problem.
Too many users.
You and up doing the same work over and over again. (see the newsgroup
sci.astro.seti)
They artificially slow down their client
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 23:37:19 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> So, my question is:
> Exactly what is it that you can't do with Arachne?
> Whatever those items might be.
> I'll bet you dollars to donuts that we can figure-out
> a way of doing them in Arachne. :))
Try going to the website of Bignet
> At 02:06 PM 4/10/2002, anarkisseD wrote:
> >I want to protect it against itself! I want to boot to DOS without
> >having to use F8. I want to make certain any "messaging" software
> >doesn't open up a back door that others can send files through. etc etc
With win95 you can alter the ms
Things are changing rather quickly these days, Glenn ..
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 23:37:19 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:29:23 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
> All of what you've just mentioned *can* be done with Arachne.
> I know because I do it all the time.
> I have made several
Begin quote, and I don't want to modify anything as by > line prefix. There are
some strange characters at the start that arouse my curiosity:
Ô(
system for DOS stuff. This MMX-233 system will remain pristine, and
Arachne will be used for all e-mail applications. I've been assured by
some tha
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:29:23 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
> Ô(
> system for DOS stuff. This MMX-233 system will remain pristine, and
> Arachne will be used for all e-mail applications. I've been assured by
> some that there *are* "safe" e-mail programs out there for dozerware,
Yep, there is one.
Ar
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 17:46:52 -0400 (EDT), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Richard Menedetter wrote:
>> LB> how can SETI At Home and the cancer research thing
>> LB> work?
>> Seti Searches ExtrateresTrial Intelligence :)
>
http://iosef.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?[EMA
At 09:29 PM 4/10/2002, you wrote:
>Why on earth a 60yo dame who can't hold a job
>feels the need to learn a new OS may be a valid question ... but I want
>to learn it. For one thing, I want to set up a better network here
>than the "hub to cable modem, no proxy" setup I'll have to begin with.
>A
Very commendable indeed!! 95th percentile is not to be sneezed at!
I plan on joining once the dozerware system is up; since I'm allowed 2
IPs, I can have both machines going at the same time ... and with cable
modem any data transfer times will be minimal, which the 1.2GHz processor
should be abl
Ô(
system for DOS stuff. This MMX-233 system will remain pristine, and
Arachne will be used for all e-mail applications. I've been assured by
some that there *are* "safe" e-mail programs out there for dozerware,
but I prefer Arachne -- it is well behaved.
As to Linux ... I really don't have ti
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Richard Menedetter wrote:
> LB> how can SETI At Home and the cancer research thing
> LB> work?
> Seti Searches ExtrateresTrial Intelligence :)
http://iosef.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?[EMAIL PROTECTED]&cmd=user_stats
:-)
- Steve
At 02:06 PM 4/10/2002, you wrote:
>I want to protect it against itself! I want to boot to DOS without
>having to use F8. I want to make certain any "messaging" software
>doesn't open up a back door that others can send files through. etc etc
>
>
>I hate M$ ... I really REALLY hate Microsoft.
>
Hi L!
10 Apr 2002, "L.D. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What do you protect your win98 against ??
>> Win98 has no open ports (if samba has been disabled)
>> if somebody wants to connect to you, he will get a ICMP Port
>> unreachable.
LB> I want to protect it against itself! I want to
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:56:22 +0200 (CEST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter) wrote:
> What do you protect your win98 against ??
> Win98 has no open ports (if samba has been disabled)
> if somebody wants to connect to you, he will get a ICMP Port unreachable.
I want to protect it against its
21 matches
Mail list logo
