Thomas Mueller wrote:
> >(btw - intrestingly enough, of Windows 2000 dies, you cant access
> >the NTFS partition with a Windows 2000 boot disk. Its just -dead-.
> >Thats the price for removing DOS from your system, I guess.)
>
> Or, are you sure? Win2000 boot disk can't even access NTFS partitio
Eric S. Emerson wrote:
> Try deleting your DOS commands in WIN and see how well
> your WIN boots up.
>
from Or Botton:
>They allready did.. they call it Windows 2000.
>And Windows 2001 is underway.
>
>Obviously, we're talking about Windows NT. But dear Uncle Bill
>said that Windows 2000 is the ne
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> As far as I know, there is a Linux version of Real Audio that can play .ram
> files. So you don't need Windblows.
The 'nix version of Real Player is generally a version behind
the doze version. Contrary to that generalization though, version
8, the
As far as I know, there is a Linux version of Real Audio that can play .ram
files. So you don't need Windblows.
> DOS is dead. Live with it. Having a rough time with the fact, myself.
If DOS is dead, CP/M should have been dead a long time ago. I was amazed by the
activity in newsgroup comp.os.
Eric S. Emerson wrote:
> Try deleting your DOS commands in WIN and see how well
> your WIN boots up.
>
They allready did.. they call it Windows 2000.
And Windows 2001 is underway.
Obviously, we're talking about Windows NT. But dear Uncle Bill
said that Windows 2000 is the next generation of Wind
Hi Clarence, et al,
You wrote:
>
>DOS isn't dead. It's just resting.
>
>- Clarence Verge
>
DOS isn't dead, it's just like the woman behind every
successful man, smart enough to let the front man
stick his neck out and let him think he is running
things. BUT if you take DOS a
Florian wrote:
>You can also use DOS as mp3 player.
You can even play OGG files in DOS (MPXPlay is supposed to be able to play
them, I haven't tested yet). If it works good I know what my computer(s)
are going to do for a while . Since the filenames are LFN anyway I
don't care that the only ones
On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 11:22:49 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Robert Deering wrote:
>> Not if you're the one trying to use DOS. If DOS as a valid user
>>platform
>> isn't dead, why is your mail client Mozilla/W95 and your IRC
client
>> mIRC16 (if you haven't switched to 32 yet)?
>
>I am sending t
e.vu - the DOS GUI -- www.drdos.org Club Dr-DOS
-- This mail was written by user of Arachne at www.arachne.cz
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Or Botton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: Dienstag, 02. Jänner 2001 10:32
Betreff: Re: Audio s
On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 04:14:37 -0500, Robert Deering wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 10:48:48 +0200, Or Botton wrote:
>> Robert Deering wrote:
>>> DOS is dead. Live with it. Having a rough time with the fact, myself.
>> For the mass home user market, yes.
>> For the private user who just want to ge
Robert Deering wrote:
> Not if you're the one trying to use DOS. If DOS as a valid user platform
> isn't dead, why is your mail client Mozilla/W95 and your IRC client
> mIRC16 (if you haven't switched to 32 yet)?
I am sending this E-Mail from Netscape 3.04 on Windows 95, because
it was still run
On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 10:48:48 +0200, Or Botton wrote:
> Robert Deering wrote:
>> DOS is dead. Live with it. Having a rough time with the fact, myself.
> For the mass home user market, yes.
> For the private user who just want to get a job done fast, or in
> buisness, or in the embadded system ma
Robert Deering wrote:
>
> DOS is dead. Live with it. Having a rough time with the fact, myself.
For the mass home user market, yes.
For the private user who just want to get a job done fast, or in
buisness, or in the embadded system market, or in mission critical
devices, its very much alive.
R
13 matches
Mail list logo
