Hi Sam!
11 Jan 2003, "Sam Ewalt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Bush invented the Department of homeland security (also known as
>> "Big Brother") 17 people working there, budget of over 35
>> billion $/year !!
SE> Homeland Security is a new bureaucratic catch all that reassigns many
Hi Samuel!
11 Jan 2003, "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[dhs]
>> And nobody cares !!!
SH> The so-called Big Brother department was created in order to
SH> consolidate the functions of several intelligence and law enforcement
SH> agencies into one big super-agency.
Yes ...
but
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:13:34 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter) wrote:
>>> Boy ... I can't say how happy I am that I had the luck of not being
>>> born in the US !
> SE> Perhaps this is easier for your conscience. I'm proud to be an
> SE> American, proud of our American democra
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:42:32 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter) wrote:
>>> And another highly sick part is the `Cyber Security Enhancement Act'
>>> (CSEA) a law that IMO clearly violates international Law, and UN
>>> law.
> SH> I have never heard of the "Cyber Security Enhancemen
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 14:20:28 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter)
wrote:
> Hi Samuel!
> 09 Jan 2003, "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SH> How can one copyright a cartridge?
> Don't ask me ... ask lexmark
> SH> Unless the container and its components have some uni
rk in its printers. "
Hope its not illegal to copy text from a web site!
John
- Original Message -
From: "Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: Comments on the DMCA and te TPCA
Hi Samuel!
09 Jan 2003, "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SH> How can one copyright a cartridge?
Don't ask me ... ask lexmark
SH> Unless the container and its components have some unique features and
SH> characteristics and component materials which make it quite unlike
SH> anyt
ECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 4:55 AM
> Subject: Re: Comments on the DMCA and te TPCA
>> On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 19:25:52 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard
> Menedetter) wrote:
>
>> > Lexmark sued an ink cartrdige refiller for violating the DMCA.
>
- Original Message -
From: "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Arachne List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 4:55 AM
Subject: Re: Comments on the DMCA and te TPCA
> On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 19:25:52 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PR
On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 19:25:52 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter)
wrote:
> Hi
> http://heise.de/newsticker/data/tig-09.01.03-000/
> (german)
> Lexmark sued an ink cartrdige refiller for violating the DMCA.
> The ink cartrdige is "copyrighted", and the making of lexmark cartridges
Hi
http://heise.de/newsticker/data/tig-09.01.03-000/
(german)
Lexmark sued an ink cartrdige refiller for violating the DMCA.
The ink cartrdige is "copyrighted", and the making of lexmark cartridges is
illegal accoring to 1201 of the DMCA.
1201 is the evasion of copyright protection schemes.
bef
In this morning's Arizona Daily Star, an Associated Press article, dateline,
Oslo, Norway, reported:
"... a Norwegian court acquitted a teen-ager of digital-burglary charges for
creating and circulating online a program that cracks the security codes on
DVDs.
...
Head Judge Irene Sogn said pe
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 14:24:42 -0500 (EST), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> > Heh, heh. How much you wanna bet they'll disagree with
>> > you? When something is done in the name of "public safety"
>> > or some such, it's fine, but when a private
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 14:24:42 -0500 (EST), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It doesn't matter whether you're talking NSA decrypting
> suspected terrorists' emails or FBI going through garbage.
> It's a "law enforcement tool" for them, but an "invasion of
> privacy" or "criminal act" if private c
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 14:24:42 -0500 (EST), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It doesn't matter whether you're talking NSA decrypting
> suspected terrorists' emails or FBI going through garbage.
> It's a "law enforcement tool" for them, but an "invasion of
> privacy" or "criminal act" if private cit
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> > Heh, heh. How much you wanna bet they'll disagree with
> > you? When something is done in the name of "public safety"
> > or some such, it's fine, but when a private citizen does the
> > same thing, it's... well, illegal.
> >
> > Case in point
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 07:31:47 + (UTC), Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> http://www.wweek.com/flatfiles/News3485.lasso
> I went to the URL. I did not find there any stories about people
> decrypting stuff. The URL was mainly about allegedly unreasonable
> police searches of some people's garbage c
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Steve wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>
> > It cannot possibly be illegal to decrypt stuff. NSA and other
> > intelligence organizations do it all the time as a normal activity
> > of their major functions. If they have the right to decrypt stuff,
> > th
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Steve wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>
> > It cannot possibly be illegal to decrypt stuff. NSA and other
> > intelligence organizations do it all the time as a normal activity
> > of their major functions. If they have the right to decrypt stuff,
> > t
To Sam Heywood, Roger Turk and possibly others,
I'm surprised you didn't hear of DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) until
recently. It's not all that new, was passed and signed under Bill Clinton's
presidency. FBI arrested a Russian, Dmitri Sklaryov, and the government pressed
charges again
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> It cannot possibly be illegal to decrypt stuff. NSA and other
> intelligence organizations do it all the time as a normal activity
> of their major functions. If they have the right to decrypt stuff,
> then so does everyone else.
Heh, heh. How m
On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 13:44:30 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Richard Menedetter) wrote:
> Hi Roger!
> 03 Jan 2003, Roger Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RT> I went to the U. S. Senate web site and did a search
> RT> for DMCA and came up with HR5522, (House of Representatives bill
> RT> number
Hi Roger!
03 Jan 2003, Roger Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RT> I went to the U. S. Senate web site and did a search
RT> for DMCA and came up with HR5522, (House of Representatives bill
RT> number 5522) which was introduced in October, 2002 and is now assigned
RT> to the courts subcommittee
Hi Ricsi,
I went to the U. S. Senate web site and did a search for
DMCA and came up with HR5522, (House of Representatives bill number 5522)
which was introduced in October, 2002 and is now assigned to the courts
subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee which is currently holding
hearing
Hi Roger!
02 Jan 2003, Roger Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RT> What is DMCA and what is it supposed to do?
digital millenium copyright act
a law that was passed, which among other things forbades circumventing DRM
(digital rights management) measures.
The porblem is that it is s extremely
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Steve wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>
>
> > -- Message sent by Unix Pine, Version 4.44
>
> There seems to be a discrepancy here. Your message id
> says you're using version 4.33.
>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Compare that to the message ID
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Richard Menedetter wrote:
> Hi Samuel!
>
> 02 Jan 2003, "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> on the paper it does not stifle competition, because everybody can
> >> (theoretically) develop TCPA compliant software or hardware.
> SH> If someone develops "ope
Hi Ricsi,
I have found your posts on this topic interesting. You are an intelligent
person and familiar with the way American government works. Your passion on
this subject, which I am very ignorant about, prompts me to ask you some
questions:
What is DMCA and what is it supposed to do? Do
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> -- Message sent by Unix Pine, Version 4.44
There seems to be a discrepancy here. Your message id
says you're using version 4.33.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Compare that to the message ID on this e-mail, for
instance.
--
Steve Ackman
Hi Samuel!
02 Jan 2003, "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But again ... Americans don't seem to care.
SH> The reason why industrial plants in Japan have modern anti-pollution
SH> technology is that they were built with money given to them by the
SH> US so that they could rebui
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Richard Menedetter wrote:
> Hi sheywood!
>
> 02 Jan 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> SH> It is believed that the law will be passed and that even
> >> SH> President Bush will sign his approval of it.
> >> Sam ... I really like your sense of humour !!!
> >> Have litte
Hi sheywood!
02 Jan 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> SH> It is believed that the law will be passed and that even
>> SH> President Bush will sign his approval of it.
>> Sam ... I really like your sense of humour !!!
>> Have litterally been laughing out loud for many minutes ...
>> that EV
On 30 Dec 2002 12:16:43 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter) wrote:
>Hi Samuel!
>23 Dec 2002, "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SH> It is believed that the law will be passed and that even President
> SH> Bush will sign his approval of it.
> Sam ... I really like your sens
33 matches
Mail list logo
