On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 06:09:28 -0400 (EDT)
"Thomas Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Linux runs on 486, but I wouldn't attempt to run GNOME or KDE.
I might wish disagree with that last statement (in the nicest possible way
! )
Linux runs fine on my Cx486/100 w/ 36M ram. That's with *KDE* - the
> "Neil Parks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BUT FAT is one of the worst (read THE worst) filesystem imagineable !
> It is simply a table which holds the information.
right!
> Modern Filesystems use a balanced binary tree. (HPFS, ExtFS2, even NTFS,
> .)
> Access is MUCH faster, and clustersiz
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000 22:54:58 +0200 (CEST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter)
wrote:
> Hi
> "Neil Parks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BUT FAT is one of the worst (read THE worst) filesystem imagineable !
> It is simply a table which holds the information.
right!
> Modern Filesystems use a
Hi
"Neil Parks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
NP> Actually, there might be one small advantage. If the "dos 7" can
NP> read a FAT32 partition, then you could make more efficient use of
NP> disk space.
Dos 7 can't (it came with Win95, which does not support fat32)
dos 7.?? can ... (win95b/win98)
> From: "Clarence Verge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 04 Sep 2000 06:07:57 -0500, "Pete" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are there any advantages of "Pure" DOS7? Memory, speed, &c.
> Haaahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahaaa.
> Hi Pete;
> That's it, keep up the humour level !!
Actually, the
Dr-DOS: www.drdos.com or www.drdos.org
so long, flo
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: Sonntag, 10. September 2000 05:51
Betreff: Re: DOS 7.0 beta
>On Thu, 07 Sep 2000 18:38:36 +0100, Joerg Dietze
On Mon, 04 Sep 2000 06:07:57 -0500, "Pete" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any advantages of "Pure" DOS7? Memory, speed, &c.
Haaahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahaaa.
Hi Pete;
That's it, keep up the humour level !!
- Clarence Verge
- Using Arachne V1.62 for a change
On Thu, 07 Sep 2000 18:38:36 +0100, Joerg Dietze wrote:
> Hi folks,
> if a pure DOS 7 is needed, have a look at
> http://www.abandonkeep.com/os/All.shtm . There You can d/l a MS-DOS 7
> beta version. Don't try it with Arachne, the main page renders funny and js is
> needed.
> Regards Joerg
Hi
Sorry, the link is wrong. It must be
http://www.abandonkeep.com/os/All.shtml. My apologies for that.
>Hi folks,
>
>if a pure DOS 7 is needed, have a look at
>http://www.abandonkeep.com/os/All.shtm . There You can d/l a MS-DOS 7
>beta version. Don't try it with Arachne, the main page renders funny
Hi folks,
if a pure DOS 7 is needed, have a look at
http://www.abandonkeep.com/os/All.shtm . There You can d/l a MS-DOS 7
beta version. Don't try it with Arachne, the main page renders funny and js is needed.
Regards Joerg
-- This mail was written by user of Arachne, the Ultimate Internet Clien
10 matches
Mail list logo