Was DOS 7.0 beta/file systems - Now KDE on 486 boxes

2000-09-15 Thread Neil Smith
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 06:09:28 -0400 (EDT) "Thomas Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Linux runs on 486, but I wouldn't attempt to run GNOME or KDE. I might wish disagree with that last statement (in the nicest possible way ! ) Linux runs fine on my Cx486/100 w/ 36M ram. That's with *KDE* - the

Re: DOS 7.0 beta/file systems

2000-09-14 Thread Thomas Mueller
> "Neil Parks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BUT FAT is one of the worst (read THE worst) filesystem imagineable ! > It is simply a table which holds the information. right! > Modern Filesystems use a balanced binary tree. (HPFS, ExtFS2, even NTFS, > .) > Access is MUCH faster, and clustersiz

Re: DOS 7.0 beta

2000-09-12 Thread sacha menge
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000 22:54:58 +0200 (CEST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter) wrote: > Hi > "Neil Parks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BUT FAT is one of the worst (read THE worst) filesystem imagineable ! > It is simply a table which holds the information. right! > Modern Filesystems use a

DOS 7.0 beta

2000-09-11 Thread Richard Menedetter
Hi "Neil Parks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: NP> Actually, there might be one small advantage. If the "dos 7" can NP> read a FAT32 partition, then you could make more efficient use of NP> disk space. Dos 7 can't (it came with Win95, which does not support fat32) dos 7.?? can ... (win95b/win98)

Re: DOS 7.0 beta

2000-09-11 Thread Neil Parks
> From: "Clarence Verge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Mon, 04 Sep 2000 06:07:57 -0500, "Pete" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are there any advantages of "Pure" DOS7? Memory, speed, &c. > Haaahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahaaa. > Hi Pete; > That's it, keep up the humour level !! Actually, the

Re: DOS 7.0 beta

2000-09-10 Thread Florian Xaver
Dr-DOS: www.drdos.com or www.drdos.org so long, flo -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Datum: Sonntag, 10. September 2000 05:51 Betreff: Re: DOS 7.0 beta >On Thu, 07 Sep 2000 18:38:36 +0100, Joerg Dietze

Re: DOS 7.0 beta

2000-09-10 Thread Clarence Verge
On Mon, 04 Sep 2000 06:07:57 -0500, "Pete" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there any advantages of "Pure" DOS7? Memory, speed, &c. Haaahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahaaa. Hi Pete; That's it, keep up the humour level !! - Clarence Verge - Using Arachne V1.62 for a change

Re: DOS 7.0 beta

2000-09-09 Thread Pete
On Thu, 07 Sep 2000 18:38:36 +0100, Joerg Dietze wrote: > Hi folks, > if a pure DOS 7 is needed, have a look at > http://www.abandonkeep.com/os/All.shtm . There You can d/l a MS-DOS 7 > beta version. Don't try it with Arachne, the main page renders funny and js is > needed. > Regards Joerg Hi

DOS 7.0 beta

2000-09-07 Thread Joerg Dietze
Sorry, the link is wrong. It must be http://www.abandonkeep.com/os/All.shtml. My apologies for that. >Hi folks, > >if a pure DOS 7 is needed, have a look at >http://www.abandonkeep.com/os/All.shtm . There You can d/l a MS-DOS 7 >beta version. Don't try it with Arachne, the main page renders funny

DOS 7.0 beta

2000-09-07 Thread Joerg Dietze
Hi folks, if a pure DOS 7 is needed, have a look at http://www.abandonkeep.com/os/All.shtm . There You can d/l a MS-DOS 7 beta version. Don't try it with Arachne, the main page renders funny and js is needed. Regards Joerg -- This mail was written by user of Arachne, the Ultimate Internet Clien