Nah ... I did better than that ...
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:32:39 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> Arachne refused to do anything except name the file .TIF time and again,
>> even though the file name was encoded as being JPG.
>> I had to go into the actual message code and change it to read
>> ima
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000 21:47:48 -0500, L.D. Best wrote:
> Sam,
> I found that changing the name of the file to JPG as it should be did
> NOT allow Arachne to show it to me in mail. The problem was NOT with
> the fact that the file was JFIF ... it was with the fact that IE had
> declared it as imag
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000 21:47:48 -0500, L.D. Best wrote:
> Sam,
> I found that changing the name of the file to JPG as it should be did
> NOT allow Arachne to show it to me in mail. The problem was NOT with
> the fact that the file was JFIF ... it was with the fact that IE had
> declared it as imag
Sam,
I found that changing the name of the file to JPG as it should be did
NOT allow Arachne to show it to me in mail. The problem was NOT with
the fact that the file was JFIF ... it was with the fact that IE had
declared it as image/tiff when encoding.
Arachne refused to do anything except nam
Sam observed:
>I have found that some www browsers and some graphics viewing programs
>do not recognize a JFIF or a JIF or a JIFF. I just rename the image file
>and give it a JPG extension, and that is the work-around that solves the
>problem for me. I don't know if anyone here knows for sure if
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:12:42 -0500, L.D. Best wrote:
> Maybe Arachne checks file type in the wrong order?? Today I got an
> attached file which was a JPG [JFIF format] and it kept *not*
> rendering because MS Outlook had declared it to be image/tiff at time of
> encoding. Despite the fact the f
You are right -- PNG support works fine if Arachne is told the file is
image/png.
Now, this is just another example of headings messing us up, and Arachne
not being able to do anything because it's told text/plain.
Maybe, just maybe, it might be possible to have a function in Arachne
that allows
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, L.D. Best wrote:
> The "Problem Children" are at http://www.mommydoll.com/doula/
>
> Anyone else able to see the "pretty pictures?"
I don't see them in Linux 1.66 either, but I do see them
in Netscape 4.75. The strange thing is that I have a png
graphic at http://twovoya
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000 19:52:33 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
> I've never run across this problem before, but maybe I've never run
> across a website that used *.PNG graphics.
> Went to a site and none of the graphics would even copy down to Arachne,
> let alone tranform into BMP
> The "Problem Childre
Found the problem:
The server send the .PNG files as "text files" or "unknown". So Arachne
deals with them as "text". If you try to right click on the PNG image
after you try to download the page, you will see its contents.
(if you only see the word "PNG", hit R to reload, and then you'll see.)
P
L.D. Best wrote:
>
> I've never run across this problem before, but maybe I've never run
> across a website that used *.PNG graphics.
>
> Went to a site and none of the graphics would even copy down to Arachne,
> let alone tranform into BMP
>
> The "Problem Children" are at http://www.mommydoll
I've never run across this problem before, but maybe I've never run
across a website that used *.PNG graphics.
Went to a site and none of the graphics would even copy down to Arachne,
let alone tranform into BMP
The "Problem Children" are at http://www.mommydoll.com/doula/
Anyone else able to s
12 matches
Mail list logo
