On Tue, 16 Oct 2001 02:07:22 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 19:51:28 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 02:19:06 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
>>> So, now I just HAVE to ask, what is that window on the bottom of your
>>> (re)compose screen for ?
>> That's my
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:54:42 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
> Clarence,
> The mail list works with any version of InSight ... What Glenn was
> talking about "not working" is the BCC carry-over to "modify" stuff in
> outbox. *That* only works with the alpha version of InSight being used.
Ahh. I don't
Clarence,
The mail list works with any version of InSight ... What Glenn was
talking about "not working" is the BCC carry-over to "modify" stuff in
outbox. *That* only works with the alpha version of InSight being used.
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001 02:07:22 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
> Seems to
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 19:51:28 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 02:19:06 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
>> So, now I just HAVE to ask, what is that window on the bottom of your
>> (re)compose screen for ?
> That's my "on-screen address book".
> (L.D. came up with the idea)
> Than
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 02:19:06 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2001 18:17:50 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> How's this one look? (made after setting up in 256 color mode)
>> http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/better03.gif
> Very nice.
> The Arachne Title bar and frame seem to be
On Sun, 14 Oct 2001 18:17:50 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> How's this one look? (made after setting up in 256 color mode)
> http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/better03.gif
Very nice.
The Arachne Title bar and frame seem to be the same color as mine now.
You should be using my NEWVIDEO.zip to
On Sun, 14 Oct 2001 03:11:36 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 16:55:50 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2001 02:32:25 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
>>> Next time you should wipe the dust off the screen before taking your
>>> screenshots. I assume you use .jpg due
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 09:33:59 -0400 (EDT), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, sodjiin wrote:
>> S> Hmmm... Did msie5 actually display the images, or
>> S> did it just allow you to download them for later
>> S> viewing? If msie can view them, I wonder why Arachne
>> S> can
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 16:55:50 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2001 02:32:25 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
>> Next time you should wipe the dust off the screen before taking your
>> screenshots. I assume you use .jpg due to the illegalities of .gif
>> but the results look pretty dirt
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 09:31:00 -0400 (EDT), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Clarence Verge wrote:
>> Except where you are using longfilenames like the .BMP. :(
> Hey, don't blame me! It was Arachne that saved it
> with that 9-digit filename! All I did was copy'n'paste
>
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001 02:32:25 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 23:10:41 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> Here's what happened:
>> http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/gopher.jpg
>> http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/gopher2.jpg
> Next time you should wipe the dust off the sc
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I remember stating some time ago that all the fancy WWW gymnastics, such as
> Java, Javascript, Shockwave, even frames, and slow-loading pages, made me wish
> the Internet could return to Gopher. I've seen only a little bit of Gopher
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, sodjiin wrote:
>
> S> Hmmm... Did msie5 actually display the images, or
> S> did it just allow you to download them for later
> S> viewing? If msie can view them, I wonder why Arachne
> S> can't. ;-)
>
> It showed the .png and the .gif but asked to save/open the .bmp
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Clarence Verge wrote:
> If Arachne could be convinced (I'm
> sure she can) to automatically save the file with the default name that
> she supplies for the manual save, and then restart with that name as
> target, it would automatically sort itself out. ;-)
>
> Except where
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> You seem to have miss-typed the URL
Well Glenn,
I got that URL by mousing over and observing the
bottom bar of NS 3.04. Using NS 4.76 shows the
same form.
> Try this one after adding this line to mime.cfg
>
> gopher/9 PNG>BM
I remember stating some time ago that all the fancy WWW gymnastics, such as
Java, Javascript, Shockwave, even frames, and slow-loading pages, made me wish
the Internet could return to Gopher. I've seen only a little bit of Gopher but
liked it better than all the Web gynmastics.
DOS Ly
S> Hmmm... Did msie5 actually display the images, or
S> did it just allow you to download them for later
S> viewing? If msie can view them, I wonder why Arachne
S> can't. ;-)
It showed the .png and the .gif but asked to save/open the .bmp.
goodday,
sodjiinmai
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 23:10:41 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> Here's what happened:
> http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/gopher.jpg
> http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/gopher2.jpg
Next time you should wipe the dust off the screen before taking your
screenshots. I assume you use .jpg due to
rror.
3Server error: Sorry, access denied or file does not exist error.host 0
.
>> Seems the proper file type are either not set or not transferred.
> Yes, so far, all files must be saved and then viewed
> separately. I'll be working on that soon.
The gopher/9 can be added to
Steve,
You seem to have miss-typed the URL
Try this one after adding this line to mime.cfg
gopher/9 PNG>BMP|$epng2bmp.exe -s -o $2 $1
gopher://wizard.dyndns.org:70/9/I/Xgopher.png
('/' was missing _ ^_)
New screen-cap
http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/gopher
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:33:24 -0400 (EDT), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Though my ISP seems to have clamped down on http
> requests, it doesn't filter all incoming SYN packets,
> so hopefully, requests to a gopher server can make it
> through. Is anyone abl
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Joerg Dietze wrote:
> > gopher://wizard.dyndns.org:70/9I/Xgopher.png
> > If not that file directly, how about through the main
> > menu at gopher://wizard.dyndns.org ?
>
> got it via menu. A. did not know mime type gopher/9 so I saved the png
>
Hello Steve,
Thursday, October 11, 2001, 9:33:24 AM, you wrote:
S> Is anyone able to retrieve this file
S> (either with DOS Arachne, or any gopher client)?
S> gopher://wizard.dyndns.org:70/9I/Xgopher.png
S> If not that file directly, how about through the main
S>
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:33:24 -0400 (EDT), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Though my ISP seems to have clamped down on http
> requests, it doesn't filter all incoming SYN packets,
> so hopefully, requests to a gopher server can make it
> through. Is anyone able to retri
Hi Steve and all,
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:33:24 -0400 (EDT), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Though my ISP seems to have clamped down on http
> requests, it doesn't filter all incoming SYN packets,
> so hopefully, requests to a gopher server can make it
> through. Is
Gopher mainly fell out of favor as an information
protocol because of a perceived blunder on the part of
the University of Minnesota. Sure they released the
protocol, client, and server for educational use, but
reserved the right to charge companies for the use of
the server when/if it
Well, whatever it's supposed to be doing, Arachne is apparently doing
...
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:13:43 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> gopher://gopher.well.com/
Cuz the above got me to a page ... :>
l.d.
-- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:46:12 +0100 (CET), Bernie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> L.D wrote:
>> I've noticed, in digging through the innards of Arachne, that some
>> type of gopher support is [supposed to be?] implemented. I've
>> never, until now, had
L.D wrote:
> I've noticed, in digging through the innards of Arachne, that some
> type of gopher support is [supposed to be?] implemented. I've
> never, until now, had any reason to know one way or another.
>
> The above page uses gopher on almost all its links, and
I've noticed, in digging through the innards of Arachne, that some
type of gopher support is [supposed to be?] implemented. I've
never, until now, had any reason to know one way or another.
The above page uses gopher on almost all its links, and Arachne
belches up the "hey, I d
30 matches
Mail list logo
