Re:(Valves) Practical Dos Deficiencies?

2002-02-06 Thread Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ
On Tue, 05 Feb 2002 11:56:55 -0600, "Rob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 05 Feb 2002 08:29:54 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote: >> On Sun, 3 Feb 02 22:23:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (howard schwartz) >> wrote: >>> I must admit the hardest part for me of abandoning Dos, is losing >>> a whole lot of progra

Re: Practical Dos Deficiencies?

2002-02-05 Thread Rob
On Tue, 05 Feb 2002 08:29:54 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote: > On Sun, 3 Feb 02 22:23:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (howard schwartz) > wrote: >> I must admit the hardest part for me of abandoning Dos, is losing >> a whole lot of programs I love that will never be ported to Linux, and >> which I will never try

Re: Practical Dos Deficiencies?

2002-02-05 Thread Sam Ewalt
On Sun, 3 Feb 02 22:23:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (howard schwartz) wrote: > I must admit the hardest part for me of abandoning Dos, is losing > a whole lot of programs I love that will never be ported to Linux, and > which I will never try to emulate by writing my own source code for. > I am no stran

Practical Dos Deficiencies?

2002-02-05 Thread Richard Menedetter
Hi howard! 03 Feb 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (howard schwartz) wrote: hs> I must admit the hardest part for me of abandoning Dos, is losing hs> a whole lot of programs I love that will never be ported to Linux, and hs> which I will never try to emulate by writing my own source code for. Same wit

Practical Dos Deficiencies?

2002-02-04 Thread howard schwartz
I must admit the hardest part for me of abandoning Dos, is losing a whole lot of programs I love that will never be ported to Linux, and which I will never try to emulate by writing my own source code for. I am no stranger to Unix, and am not afraid of it at all. That said, I found some of the ac