Re: Re: The Future of Arachne

2002-07-01 Thread bernie
Glenn wrote: > Bernie knows too much. ;-) > He just might be able to win. "Might"? No I wouldn't since I wouldn't be interested in writing code that did something like that. > He's not allowed to play this game. ;-) > > Michael isn't allowed to play either. ;-) > He *would* win. I suggest

Re: {ARACHNE MSG="del file:*.*"} Was Re: The Future of Arachne

2002-06-30 Thread Ron Clarke
Hi Clarence, That was a pretty direct object lesson. Had me going there for a moment. Your point is well made: Even Arachne can be gutted by a targetted attack. On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 20:01:33 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote: > I'd sure LIKE to say that. Maybe we should do some testing to see

Re: Re: The Future of Arachne

2002-06-30 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 02:23:53 -0700, bernie wrote: > Glenn wrote: >> Sure, you can "overflow" any web browser. >> But that's not a virus or a worm. >> AFAIK, >> Causing an "overflow" can't damage anything on the >> recipients computer system. > Hmm... perhaps I should take you up on the challen

Re: The Future of Arachne

2002-06-30 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 01:45:38 -0700, Sam Ewalt wrote: > On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 21:15:47 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote: >> I hereby challenge anyone and everyone who thinks that Arachne is >> vulnerable to virus attack to try infecting my computer with a virus. >> You have until the end of the day on

Re: Re: The Future of Arachne

2002-06-30 Thread bernie
Glenn wrote: > Sure, you can "overflow" any web browser. > > But that's not a virus or a worm. > > AFAIK, > Causing an "overflow" can't damage anything on the > recipients computer system. Hmm... perhaps I should take you up on the challenge you mentioned in another post just to get a free mea

Re: The Future of Arachne

2002-06-30 Thread Sam Ewalt
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 21:15:47 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote: > I hereby challenge anyone and everyone who thinks that Arachne is > vulnerable to virus attack to try infecting my computer with a virus. > You have until the end of the day on July 31, 2002 to infect me. > Go ahead... try it. I dare

Re: The Future of Arachne

2002-06-29 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 23:22:47 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 18:56:59 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote: >> I agree 100% >> So Clarence, >> Does a new "default tagline" go into the package we are working on??? >> Something like >> -- >> This mail was written by a user of The Arach

Re: The Future of Arachne

2002-06-29 Thread Sam Ewalt
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 15:01:44 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote: > That functionality isn't absent in DOS and *I* don't think it's > important anyway. We are plagued with virii and worms mostly because > some incomplete personalities see the notoriety of their efforts > as their only way to contribute

Re: The Future of Arachne

2002-06-29 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 15:01:44 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 17:47:23 -0500, Day Brown wrote: >> Clarence Verge wrote: CV>>> Arachne's Insight is FAR from perfect. CV>>> There is a sensitivity to HTML in the header. DB>> How does html give access to the drive? I can possibly

Re: The Future of Arachne

2002-06-29 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 13:18:34 -0500, Day Brown wrote: > The modularization makes it more clear what is being passed > from one app to another, and thereby simpler to setup firewalls > between them. Given the size of dram these days, there's no > reason that .html cannot be run on a ram disk, wit

Re: The Future of Arachne

2002-06-29 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 22:38:45 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 20:35:01 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote: >> Well, you got to me thinking. ;-) >> She was not 100% safe after-all. >> If someone DID uncomment these lines. >> Arachne would "branch-out" and run the executable file. >>

Re: The Future of Arachne

2002-06-29 Thread Clarence Verge
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 17:47:23 -0500, Day Brown wrote: > Clarence Verge wrote: >> Arachne's Insight is FAR from perfect. >> There is a sensitivity to HTML in the header. > How does html give access to the drive? I can possibly see it > call an executable that ostensibly was made to run a wav or >

Re: The Future of Arachne

2002-06-29 Thread Day Brown
I think there are unwarrented assumptions about the motivation and character of sabotage software coders. 1- fame. An attack on Arachne would not happen because the market share is so small it wouldnt make the news. 2- money. Back when Microsoft had XP ready, they laid off lots of programmers, m

Re: The Future of Arachne

2002-06-29 Thread Day Brown
hacker competent enough to mess with dos would do a whole lot better for himself messing with Microsoft software. I'd be more likely to be hit with lightning than a dos hacker. The future of Arachne lies in this simplicity of an open source operating system where weaknesses such as the html t

Re: The Future of Arachne

2002-06-29 Thread Day Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You can do that in HTML, either you use CSS or you can use a more basic (but >wastefull) approach by using tables. But neither is as easy as using ANSI.SYS I tried Bernie, but then I was trying something new. I was creating an ebook, but colorized the text. in dialog

Re: The Future of Arachne

2002-06-28 Thread Clarence Verge
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 01:33:53 -0500, Day Brown wrote: > The Arachne tagline should mention the immunity to viruses. THAT'S an effing GREAT idea ! - Clarence Verge - Back to using Arachne V1.62

The Future of Arachne

2002-06-27 Thread Day Brown
Well, for one thing, the look and feel of the pc interface is subject to fads the same as everything else is. But the most basic thing is that plain old vanilla ascii like this goes way back in History. A lot further than folks think. Like a bread platter from Gradesnica Bulgaria with 4 lines of