On Mon, 17 Jun 2002 07:12:01 +, Ray Andrews wrote:
>> Glenn McCorkle and Clarence Verge and several others are putting
>> together an Arachne for DOS update. (If you notice Glenn uses
>> Arachne 1.71 as his mailer. He now describes it as "stable."
> But, but, Arachne is writen in C, no? If
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 14:21:30 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> There will always be something else to fix and improve!! It could be
> an endless quest for pefection.
> Of course maybe that's a better way than release and revise and
> then revise again as in the past where we'd get three or four
> new v
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 13:29:52 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
> It means I try to keep Glenn's spirits up while he tries to make yet
> another (and another) change before releasing it.
> I'm the great delayer.
There will always be something else to fix and improve!! It could be
an endless quest f
On Mon, 17 Jun 2002 07:12:01 +, Ray Andrews wrote:
> But, but, Arachne is writen in C, no? If Clarence is helping with the
> next update, dosen't that mean ...
That means nothing either sinister like "Clarence is learning C"
or impossible like "Clarence is converting it to ASM" !
It mea
> Glenn McCorkle and Clarence Verge and several others are putting
> together an Arachne for DOS update. (If you notice Glenn uses
> Arachne 1.71 as his mailer. He now describes it as "stable."
But, but, Arachne is writen in C, no? If Clarence is helping with the
next update, dosen't that mean
